MIGNE.APP

Patrologia Latina · Vol. 96 · Anonymous

TRACTATUS

PL 96, coll. 1379–1386  ·  Latin from the Migne printing  ·  First English translation  ·  column numbers follow the original plates, not the Garnier reprint

Tractatus

1379BSerpens ille veternosus, qui dudum contra catholicam fidem haereticorum linguas exacuit, nunc quoque 1379Ccujusdam Arseniotis labia erroris sui veneno infecta, post illorum perenne silentium, ad redivivas blasphemias aperire satagit. Insibilans enim per eumdem submurmurat virum, si tamen res ita se habet ut de illo fama vulgavit, quod ante novissimum examinis diem nullus electus regna coelorum, nullus reprobus loca penetret inferorum. Quod nimirum pravae haereseos dogma si vel ad momentum recipiatur, magnum fidelibus detrimentum afferre probatur: facit enim eos et ad vitae gaudia quaerenda pigerrimos, et ad gehennae supplicia vitanda nimis incautos. Contra quem utique facilis est mihi congressus, quia omnes rectae fidei assertores mecum destruunt ejus conatus; nullus namque ei patriarcharum, nullus prophetarum, nullus consentit apostolorum: 1379Dnon scilicet Moyses, non David, non Salomon, non Isaias propheta, non ullus post Isaiam alius propheta, non Petrus apostolus, non Paulus, non Joannes, non Matthaeus, non Judas, non Jacobus, non Lucas, non Marcus: sed nec ullus omnino catholicae fidei tractator post istos hujus errorem attentasse aliquando fuit inventus. Et ut egregios commemorem de multis, non Gregorius Nazianzenus, non Joannes Constantinopolitanus, non Pictaviensis Hilarius, non Mediolanensis Ambrosius, non Hipponiregius Augustinus, non Bethlehemiticus Hieronymus, 1380Bnon Alexandrinus Cyrillus, non ita docuit Gregorius papa Romanus. Horum certe plura ego 1380Cin sanctis tractatibus legi, sed in his huic simile nusquam inveni. Quis autem non videat quantae sit temeritatis, quantaeque dementiae, quemlibet unum mendacem homunculum contra tot veracissimos insignisque virtutis testes, sine teste congredi velle? Sed necesse est ut hoc quod veritatis defensione nudis verbis asserimus, vestitis sententiis plenius indagemus.

Veritatis igitur scripturam sequentes, ostendamus primo, si placet, ante adventum Mediatoris in carnem omnes reprobos omnesque electos ad infernum descendisse, quanquam inter hos et illos diversa merita magnum firmaverint chasma; ac deinde post ejusdem sacratissimam mortem, et electos ad regna coelestia, et reprobos ad loca pervenisse poenalia. Quod enim 1380Dante incarnatam Dei sapientiam peccatores ad inferna descenderint, Mosaica testatur auctoritas, quae Dathan et Abiron eorumque socios, terra sorbente, ait, descenderunt in infernum viventes. Et haec quidem illa specialiter de quibusdam; generaliter vero de cunctis Davidica promitur aeque sententia, qua dicitur: Sicut oves in inferno positi sunt, et mors pascet eos (Psal. XLVIII, 15). In libro quoque, qui Salomonis Sapientia praenotatur, enarratis multis reproborum miseriis, ipsa Sapientia ita concludit dicens: Talia dixerunt in inferno hi qui peccaverunt (Sap. V, 14). 1381AQuod autem etiam electi, et si forte non omnimoda, quaedam tamen inferorum adierint loca, idem hoc de se ipsis attestantur. Jacob enim patriarcha beatus, unius sublati filii moerore contractus, nullaque caeterorum consolatione delinitus ait: Descendam ad filium meum lugens in infernum (Gen. XXXVII, 35). Job quoque super omnes justos suis temporibus ore Domini collaudatus, de semetipso loquitur dicens: In profundissimum infernum descendent omnia mea (Job XVII, 16). Et rursum: Si sustinuero, inquit, infernus domus mea est (Ibid., vers. 13). Rursumque Deum expostulans dicit: Quis mihi tribuat ut in inferno protegas me, et abscondas me, donec pertranseat furor tuus? (Job XIV, 13.) David etiam secundum carnem Christi pater electus, de se ac de cunctis viventibus 1381Bsciendo interrogat dicens: Quis est homo qui vivit, et non videbit mortem? aut quis eruet animam suam de manu inferi? (Psal. LXXXVIII, 49.) Ac si aperte dicat, quantum ad praesens attinet tempus, nullus omnino.

Ad electorum igitur animas de inferno liberandas Christus erat exspectandus, quem videlicet Joannes Baptista in carcere positus, missis discipulis rogavit dicens: Tu es qui venturus es, an alium exspectamus? (Luc. VII, 19.) In quibus utique verbis aperte notandum, quia spiritus propheticae visionis, qui eumdem Joannem de praeterito jam docuerat, adhuc de futuro certum non fecerat; atque ideo quem jam venisse pro certo sciebat, adhuc venturum ambigebat: quia enim mundi Redemptor nascendo in mundum advenerat, 1381Cbeatus hoc idem Baptista jam liquido noverat, secundum illud quod praecurrens de eo clamaverat: Ego vidi et testimonium perhibui quoniam hic est Filius Dei (Joan. I, 34). Et ad discipulos: Ecce, inquit, Agnus Dei (Ibid., vers. 36). Sed si moriendo ad inferos per semetipsum esset venturus, omnino necdum agnoverat; et inde est illud praemissum, quo requirebat, Tu es qui venturus es, an alium exspectamus? Ac si ei diceret, ad ergastula tuorum mox descensuro patenter insinua, quem illis liberatorem venturum esse denuntiem, te quem jam venisse mundo nuntiavi, an alium quem pro te mittendum hactenus ignoravi? Tu nos inde extrahes per sanguinem sacratissimae passionis, an alius ignotae legationis? Quia vero non per quemlibet alium, sed per semetipsum 1381Did fecit, praedicto Joanni ex obliquo mandavit. Sed manifestius illud Zacharias aperuit, qui hoc quod certissime futurum esse praevidit, jam quasi factum narravit. Sic enim ad eum qui inferos captivavit praesentialiter ait: Tu quoque in sanguine testamenti tui emisisti vinctos tuos de lacu, ubi non est aqua (Zach. IX, 11). Et qui sunt isti vincti nisi, ut Hieronymus docet, justi antiqui? Unde autem vincti, nisi ex praevaricatione reatus primi? Et quis iste lacus in quo tenebantur captivi, nisi loca sunt inferi ubi non est, ut dicitur, aqua, videlicet requies ulla? Inde est etiam illud quod dives ibidem inflammatus, guttam aquae ad linguae refrigerium quaerit, et non invenit. Quod si ita est, quomodo Abraham ab eo separatus, 1382Ain requie cum Lazaro est, et ne ad se invicem transire possent, inter electos ac reprobos magnum chasma firmatum?

An forte praedictum chasma inter bonos et malos objectum non locorum spatia, sed actorum dirimit merita? Mirum autem et valde mirum, si tenes ita. Nam et Job, cui similis in terra non erat, ad poenalia loca iturum se esse clamabat, cum diceret: Plangam dolorem meum antequam vadam, et non revertar, ad terram tenebrosam et opertam mortis caligine, terram miseriae et tenebrarum (Job, X, 20-22). Absit autem ut illic Abraham et Job loca disjungerent, quos hic fides et opera inseparabiliter conjunxerant; atque horum illuc unus ad requiem, alter destinaretur ad miseriam; horumque unus in lumine, alter ibi 1382Bsederet in mortis caligine. Videamus itaque utrumne etiam Job praefatus ad terram tenebrosam et opertam mortis caligine, ad terram quoque miseriae et tenebrarum perductus in Abrahae fuerit requie collocatus. Idem denique, cum lacrymosius hoc quod supra protulimus, diceret, in profundissimum infernum descendent omnia mea, continuo praesumptiva dubitatione subjecit, et ait: Putasne saltem ibi requies erit mihi? (Job, XXVII, 16.) Nos autem ista dicentes, nequaquam temere affirmamus non fuisse apud inferos loca divisa inter electos et reprobos, cum tamen potuisset fieri ut sic inter hos et illos sola merita dividerent, sicut inter regis Babyloniae ministros, et Danielis socios justitia sola distinxit, nam una eademque fornacis flamma et illos consumpsit et istos servavit. Sic denique 1382Caqua maris Rubri, et Israelitis ad manna vescendum iter praebuit, et Aegyptiis ad mortis supplicium foveam ministravit. Hoc itaque cum magna dicimus auctoritate loca fuisse poenalia, quae Christus propter suorum ereptionem per semetipsum judicavit esse lustranda, Petro attestante, qui de illo ait: Quem Deus suscitavit a mortuis, solutis doloribus inferni, juxta quod impossibile erat teneri illum ab eo (Act. II, 24). In quibus profecto verbis solerter notandum, quoniam nemo apud inferos liber a dolorum vinculis, praeter eum qui solus veraciter dixit: Factus sum sicut homo sine adjutorio, inter mortuos liber (Psal. LXXXVII, 5). Atque ideo solus non potuit tartarea manu vinctus teneri, quia solus non habuit peccatum 1382Dquod dolorum ejus nexibus posset arctari. Indeque solus ab inferni doloribus alios liberare valuit, unde ipse eosdem dolores non sensit.

Scio autem quemdam inter magnos tractatores haec verba ita sensisse, ut non in patriarchis atque prophetis, sed in aliis longe ab istorum sedibus positis, praefatos dolores solverit Christus; et tamen non est ausus dicere, eos quos iisdem dolorum nexibus solvit, non fuisse electos; quod utique si diceret, mendax profecto appareret. Concedamus itaque quod non fuerint patriarchae atque prophetae, sed alii, et tamen electi, qui minus de perfecta justitia habentes, inferni doloribus fuerint obligati. Sed si plena ibi patriarcharum ac prophetarum quies, plenaque erat consolatio, quae illis necessaria Christi exspectatio? 1383AAn non erat Joannes propheta et plus quam propheta, qui ex sua aliorumque prophetarum persona, ut supra meminimus, Redemptorem mundi requirebat dicens: Tu es qui venturus es, an alium exspectamus? (Luc. VII, 19) Certe exspectabant eum isti vincti in lacu, ubi non est aqua; et mirum si aliis vinculis astricti, nisi his quae Petrus per Christum soluta narravit. Coarctat nos rursum haec quaestio, ut dicamus quomodo ibi Lazarus in sinu Abrahae consolabatur, si dolorum vinculis astrictus tenebatur? Sed faciamus distinctionem inter dolorem et dolorem, et hanc, ut arbitror, facilius absolvimus quaestionem. Cruciabantur itaque apud inferos iniqui simul et justi, sed non pari modo isti et illi, quia illi omnimoda ignis gehenna, isti sola mentis tristitia; illi quia foris ardebant, 1383Bisti quia intus moerebant; illi consolari non poterant, quia in tormentis refrigerium nullum habebant, isti quamvis tristarentur, quia diu a coelesti patria exsulabant, tamen consolabantur, quia exterior illos reproborum ambustio non vexabat.

Ergo quod de lacu dicitur, quia non est in eo aqua, non ad electorum mentis dolorem, sed ad reproborum pertinet exteriorem ignis ardorem; in quo videlicet, quia ultrix est flamma, nec una saltem ad refrigerium aquae suppetit gutta, quam nisi ex fluentis electorum hauriri posse cognosceret, dives ad Abraham minime diceret: Mitte Lazarum, ut intingat extremum digiti sui in aqua, et refrigeret linguam meam, quia crucior in hac flamma (Luc. XVI, 24). Ita plane non esse contrarium dicimus apud inferos dolorum 1383Cvinculis religatos fuisse justos antiquos. Sed quid? Sive certam, sive dubiam de inferno in hac parte protulerimus sententiam; hoc tamen veracissime dicimus, quia Dei Filius indebitam pro nobis mortem exsolvens, quoquo pacto in quibuslibet fuerit factum, solutis doloribus inferni, suos inde tantum reduxit; sicut ipse per Osee longe ante praedixit: Ero mors tua, o mors; ero morsus tuus, inferne (Ose., XIII, 14). In quibus profecto verbis solerter pensandum est, quia Redemptor noster mortem quidem funditus occidit, sed nimirum in parte quam ipse glutivit; caeterum mors in parte quae remansit, permansit. Dicatur igitur, ero mors tua, o mors, ac si diceretur, in praeda, quam capio, te funditus interimo. Ero morsus 1383Dtuus, inferne, hoc est, non te totum deglutio, sed partem ex te mordens consumo. Neque enim, ut catholica fides praefixit, alios inde quam suos interventu beatissimae passionis ad superos reduxit.

Sed jam ordo praemissus deposcit, ut post ereptionem ab inferis veterum justorum, ostendamus quo isto nunc tempore recipiantur animae perfectorum. Coelorum etenim Magister, qui nullum aliquando 1384Afefellit, talem hinc sententiam firmavit, ut diceret, a diebus Joannis Baptistae Regnum coelorum vim patitur, et violenti diripiunt illud (Matth. XI, 12). O tu doctor novi erroris, nunquid tantum in die judicii regnum coelorum violenti diripiunt? ut diabolus per os tuum construxit, et non potius a dibus Joannis? . . . . . .

Hic deest folium unum. . . . illa si placet, de multis sufficiant ista; si vero propter exiguitatis meae personam in dubium veniunt et ista, necessarium reor generali catholicorum sententia, verum me in his quae dixi testem approbare. In ecclesiasticorum etenim dogmate, quod distinctis sententiis uno volumine comprehenditur, quodque per universum orbem a cunctis recipitur, ab 1384Bomnibus defenditur, summaque laude celebratur, titulo quadragesimo quinto ita scribitur: « Ante passionem Domini omnes animae sanctorum in inferno sub debito praevaricationis Adae tenebantur, donec auctoritate Domini per indebitam ejus mortem de servili conditione liberarentur. » In sequenti quoque titulo, hoc est quadragesimo sexto, talis auctoritas continetur, ut dicatur: « Post ascensionem Domini ad coelos, omnes sanctorum animae cum Christo sunt, et exeuntes de corpore ad Christum vadunt, exspectantes resurrectionem corporis sui, ut ad integram et perfectam beatitudinem cum ipso pariter immutentur. Sicut et peccatorum animae in inferno sub timore positae, exspectant resurrectionem sui corporis, ut cum ipso ad poenam convertantur aeternam. » 1384CHaec omnium praecedentium ac subsequentium et una et singularis et generalis est Patrum sententia: cui merito concordans beatus Gregorius papa Romanus praesul apostolicae sedis, tractatorum quidem ultimus, sed pene omnium egregius, in quarto Dialogorum libro ad inquisitionem collocutoris sui ita respondit dicens: « Constat quia perfectorum justorum animae, mox ut hujus carnis claustro exeunt, in coelestibus sedibus recipiuntur. Quod et ipsa per se Veritas attestatur dicens: Ubicunque fuerit corpus, illuc congregabuntur et aquilae (Luc. XXVII, 37); quia ubi ipse Redemptor noster est corpore, illuc colliguntur et animae justorum. Et Paulus dissolvi desiderat, et cum Christo esse. Qui ergo Christum in 1384Dcoelo esse non dubitat, nec Pauli animam in coelo esse negabit: qui etiam de corporis sui dissolutione atque habitatione patriae coelestis dicit: Scimus quoniam si terrestris domus non habens habitatorem dilabitur, quod aedificationem habemus ex Deo, domum non manu factam, sed aeternam in coelis. » (II Cor. V, 1.)

Haec ille de justis atque perfectis. Quid vero de 1385Ainiquis? « Quia esse, inquiens ad praedictum collocutorem suum, sanctorum animas in coelo sacri eloquii satisfactione credidisti, oportet ut per omnia esse credas et iniquorum animas in inferno; quia ex retributione internae justitiae, ex qua justi gloriantur, necesse est per omnia ut et injusti crucientur. Nam sicut electos beatitudo laetificat, ita credi necesse est quod a die exitus sui ignis reprobos exurat. » Quae nimirum cuncta idem veracissimus doctor non solum verborum sententiis, verum etiam rerum ostendit exemplis. Idem certe in praefato libro narravit, quod anima Germani episcopi in sphaera ignea ab angelis fuerit in coelum sublata. Idem quod sancti Benedicti per viam palliis stratam ad supernam regionem perducta. Idem quod servuli hospitalis 1385Bparalytici ab internis coelorum laudibus suscepta, ac super altissimos eorum cardines evecta. Idem quod sacrae virginis Scholasticae ad aethereum 1386Athalamum in columbae specie perducta. Idem quod venerabilis Romulae ad perennem vitam coelestibus exsequiis assumpta. Idem quoque dixit quod spiritus Gordianae amitae ejus gehennae incendiis fuerit mancipatus. Quod Hilliricianus monachus ad inferorum loca deductus, hujus saeculi potentes ac divites in medio flammarum viderit suspensos. Sufficit, satis est. Quis fidelium de hac re ultra dubitare potest? Multum idoneus et iste testis est, contra cujus sententias ire nefas est. Quapropter admonitos vos esse volo, quoscunque imperitissimus ille mendaciorum anfractibus a coelesti sapientia deviare conatus est, ut ad procinctum fidei tendentes non quasso ranunculi stridore a coepto itinere deviemini, sed clarissime resonantem supernae civitatis tubae clangorem 1386Bsequamini. Haec est mea pro vobis ad Deum deprecatio, haec etiam ad vos mea salutatio. Amen.

Treatise

1379BThat drowsy old serpent, who long ago sharpened the tongues of heretics against the catholic faith, now also busies himself 1379Cwith opening, after their unending silence, the lips of a certain Arseniotes, infected with the venom of his error, to blasphemies come back to life. For hissing through that same man he mutters — if indeed the matter stands as report has spread it about concerning him — that before the last day of examination no elect person enters the kingdoms of the heavens, and no reprobate the places of hell. And if this doctrine of a depraved heresy be accepted even for a moment, it is proved to bring great harm to the faithful: for it makes them both most sluggish in seeking the joys of life, and far too incautious in avoiding the punishments of Gehenna. Against him the encounter is certainly easy for me, since all who assert the right faith join with me in destroying his attempts; for none of the patriarchs agrees with him, none of the prophets, none of the apostles — 1379Dnot Moses, not David, not Solomon, not the prophet Isaiah, nor any other prophet after Isaiah, not Peter the apostle, not Paul, not John, not Matthew, not Jude, not James, not Luke, not Mark. Nor indeed, after these, has any expounder at all of the catholic faith ever been found to have attempted this man's error. And to call to mind some outstanding men out of many: not Gregory Nazianzen, not John of Constantinople, not Hilary of Poitiers, not Ambrose of Milan, not Augustine of Hippo Regius, not Jerome of Bethlehem, 1380Bnot Cyril of Alexandria, nor did Gregory, pope of Rome, teach so. Assuredly I have read many things of these men 1380Cin their holy treatises, but among them I have nowhere found anything like this. And who would not see how great a rashness it is, and how great a madness, that any one lying manikin should wish, without a witness, to contend against so many most truthful witnesses of remarkable virtue? But it is necessary that what we assert in bare words for the defense of the truth, we should track down more fully in clothed sentences.

Following, then, the writing of truth, let us show first, if it please you, that before the coming of the Mediator in the flesh all the reprobate and all the elect descended to hell — although between the latter and the former their differing merits established a great chasm; and next, that after that same most sacred death, both the elect came to the heavenly kingdoms and the reprobate to the places of punishment. For that 1380Dbefore the incarnation of God's wisdom sinners descended to the regions below, the Mosaic authority testifies, which says of Dathan and Abiram and their companions, the earth swallowing them, that they went down alive into hell. And these things indeed are said particularly of certain men; but generally of all a Davidic sentence is likewise brought forth, in which it is said: They are laid in hell like sheep, and death shall feed upon them (Psal. XLVIII, 15). In the book also which is entitled the Wisdom of Solomon, when many miseries of the reprobate have been recounted, Wisdom herself concludes thus, saying: Such things did they say in hell who have sinned (Sap. V, 14). 1381ABut that the elect too — even if perhaps not all of them — nevertheless approached certain places of the regions below, these same men bear witness concerning themselves. For the blessed patriarch Jacob, drawn together with grief at one son taken from him, and soothed by no consolation from the rest, says: I will go down mourning to my son into hell (Gen. XXXVII, 35). Job also, praised by the Lord's own mouth above all the just of his times, speaks of himself, saying: All that is mine shall go down into the deepest hell (Job XVII, 16). And again: If I wait, he says, hell is my house (Ibid., vers. 13). And again, appealing to God, he says: Who will grant me this, that thou protect me in hell, and hide me until thy wrath pass by? (Job XIV, 13.) David also, according to the flesh the chosen father of Christ, asks concerning himself and concerning all the living, 1381Bknowing the answer, saying: What man is he that liveth, and shall not see death? or who shall deliver his soul from the hand of hell? (Psal. LXXXVIII, 49.) As if he were plainly saying: as far as the present time is concerned, no one at all.

Christ, therefore, was to be awaited for the freeing of the souls of the elect from hell — Christ whom John the Baptist, set in prison, asked by sending his disciples, saying: Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? (Luc. VII, 19.) And in these words it is plainly to be noted that the spirit of prophetic vision, which had already taught that same John concerning the past, had not yet made him certain concerning the future; and therefore he whom he already knew for certain to have come, he still doubted was to come. For that the Redeemer of the world had come into the world by being born, 1381Cthe blessed Baptist already knew clearly, according to that which he had cried out about him as his forerunner: I saw, and bore witness, that this is the Son of God (Joan. I, 34). And to his disciples: Behold, he says, the Lamb of God (Ibid., vers. 36). But whether by dying he was to come in his own person to the regions below, he had by no means yet learned; and thence comes that question set forth above, in which he inquired, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? As if he were saying to him: to me, who am soon to go down to the prison-houses of your own, make it plainly known whom I am to announce as the liberator who will come to them — you, whom I have already announced to the world as having come, or another whom I have hitherto not known was to be sent in your place? Will you draw us out thence by the blood of your most sacred passion, or another by an embassy unknown to me? But that he did this not through any other but through himself, 1381Dhe indicated to the aforesaid John indirectly. Yet Zechariah disclosed it more openly, who narrated as already done that which he foresaw would most certainly come to pass. For thus he speaks, as though in the present, to him who took hell captive: Thou also, by the blood of thy testament, hast sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water (Zach. IX, 11). And who are these prisoners, unless, as Jerome teaches, the ancient just? And whence prisoners, unless from the guilt of the first transgression? And what is this pit in which they were held captive, unless the places of hell, where there is not, as is said, water — that is, any rest? Thence too is that saying, that the rich man, burning in that same place, seeks a drop of water for the cooling of his tongue, and does not find it. But if this is so, how is it that Abraham, separated from him, 1382Ais at rest with Lazarus, and that, lest they might cross over to one another, a great chasm was established between the elect and the reprobate?

Or perhaps the aforesaid chasm set between the good and the wicked divides not the intervals of places, but the merits of deeds? But it is a wonder, and a very great wonder, if you so hold. For Job also, whose like there was not upon earth, cried out that he was to go to the places of punishment, when he said: I will bewail my sorrow before I go, and return not, to a land that is dark and covered with the mist of death, a land of misery and of darkness (Job, X, 20-22). But far be it that places should have separated there Abraham and Job, whom here faith and works had joined inseparably; and that of these the one should be assigned thither to rest, and the other to misery; and that of these the one should sit in light, and the other there 1382Bin the mist of death. Let us see, therefore, whether Job too, having been led, as was said, to the land dark and covered with the mist of death, and to the land of misery and darkness, was set in Abraham's rest. Indeed the same man, when he said more tearfully that which we brought forward above, all that is mine shall go down into the deepest hell, immediately added with presuming doubt, and said: Dost thou think that at least there will be rest for me there? (Job, XXVII, 16.) But we, in saying these things, in no way rashly affirm that among the regions below there were not places divided between the elect and the reprobate — although it could have come about that merits alone thus divided the latter from the former, just as justice alone distinguished between the ministers of the king of Babylon and the companions of Daniel; for one and the same flame of the furnace both consumed those and preserved these. So too 1382Cthe water of the Red Sea both furnished the Israelites a road to the eating of manna, and supplied the Egyptians a pit for the punishment of death. And so we say with great authority that there were places of punishment which Christ, for the rescue of his own, judged were to be visited by himself, with Peter bearing witness, who says of him: Whom God hath raised up from the dead, having loosed the sorrows of hell, according as it was impossible that he should be held by it (Act. II, 24). In which words it is assuredly to be noted with care that no one among the regions below was free from the bonds of sorrows, save him who alone truly said: I am become as a man without help, free among the dead (Psal. LXXXVII, 5). And therefore he alone could not be held bound by the hand of hell, because he alone had no sin 1382Dthat could be constrained by the fastenings of its sorrows. And thence he alone was able to free others from the sorrows of hell, in that he himself did not feel those same sorrows.

Now I know that a certain man among the great expounders understood these words in such a way that it was not in the patriarchs and prophets, but in others set far from their seats, that Christ loosed the aforesaid sorrows; and yet he did not dare to say that those whom he loosed from the same fastenings of sorrows were not among the elect — which, if he did say it, he would assuredly appear a liar. Let us grant, therefore, that they were not the patriarchs and prophets, but others, and yet elect, who, having less of perfect justice, had been bound by the sorrows of hell. But if the rest of the patriarchs and prophets there was full, and their consolation full, what need had they of awaiting Christ? 1383AOr was not John a prophet, and more than a prophet, who, in his own person and in that of the other prophets, as we recalled above, sought the Redeemer of the world, saying: Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another? (Luc. VII, 19) Assuredly those prisoners in the pit, where there is no water, were awaiting him; and it would be a wonder if they were bound by other bonds than those which Peter related were loosed by Christ. Again this question presses us close, that we should say how Lazarus was there consoled in Abraham's bosom, if he was held bound by the fastenings of sorrows. But let us make a distinction between one sorrow and another, and thus, I think, we resolve this question more easily. And so among the regions below the wicked and the just alike were tormented, but not in equal manner these and those, since the former were tormented by the Gehenna of fire in every way, the latter by sadness of mind alone; the former because they burned outwardly, 1383Bthe latter because they grieved inwardly; the former could not be consoled, since in their torments they had no cooling; the latter, although they were saddened because they were long exiled from the heavenly fatherland, were nevertheless consoled, since the outward scorching of the reprobate did not vex them.

Therefore that which is said of the pit, that there is no water in it, pertains not to the sorrow of mind of the elect, but to the outward burning of the fire of the reprobate; in which, namely, since the flame is avenging, there is not even one drop of water at hand for cooling — which, unless he had known that it could be drawn from the streams of the elect, the rich man would by no means have said to Abraham: Send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue, for I am tormented in this flame (Luc. XVI, 24). Thus we plainly say that it is not contrary that the ancient just were bound among the regions below by the fastenings of sorrows. 1383CBut what of it? Whether we have brought forward a certain or a doubtful opinion concerning hell in this respect, this nevertheless we say most truly: that the Son of God, paying for us the death he did not owe, in whatever manner and in whatever persons it was done, having loosed the sorrows of hell, brought back thence only his own; just as he himself long before foretold through Hosea: O death, I will be thy death; O hell, I will be thy bite (Ose., XIII, 14). In which words it is assuredly to be weighed with care that our Redeemer did indeed utterly slay death, but only in the part which he himself swallowed down; whereas death, in the part that remained, remained. Let it be said, therefore, O death, I will be thy death, as though it were said: in the prey which I take, I utterly destroy thee. O hell, I will be thy bite, 1383Dthat is, I do not swallow thee whole, but biting a part from thee I consume it. For he did not, as the catholic faith has laid down beforehand, bring back thence to the world above any others than his own, by the intervention of his most blessed passion.

But now the order set forth demands that, after the rescue of the ancient just from the regions below, we show whither at this present time the souls of the perfect are received. For the Master of the heavens, who never at any time 1384Adeceived anyone, established a sentence on this from which he said that, from the days of John the Baptist, the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force (Matth. XI, 12). O you teacher of a new error, do the violent take the kingdom of heaven by force only on the day of judgment? — as the devil has framed it through your mouth — and not rather from the dibus of John? . . . . . .

Here one leaf is missing. . . . if it please you, let these things out of many suffice; but if, on account of the person of my littleness, even these come into doubt, I judge it necessary to approve myself a true witness in these things I have said, by the general opinion of the catholics. For in the Dogma of the Churchmen, which is comprised in one volume by distinct sentences, and which is received throughout the whole world by all, defended by 1384Ball, and celebrated with the highest praise, it is thus written under the forty-fifth heading: « Before the passion of the Lord all the souls of the saints were held in hell under the debt of Adam's transgression, until by the authority of the Lord they were freed from their servile condition through his undeserved death. » In the following heading also, that is the forty-sixth, such an authority is contained, as to say: « After the ascension of the Lord to the heavens, all the souls of the saints are with Christ, and going forth from the body they go to Christ, awaiting the resurrection of their body, that they may be transformed to whole and perfect blessedness together with him. As also the souls of sinners, set in hell under fear, await the resurrection of their body, that they may be turned with it to eternal punishment. » 1384CThis is the opinion of the Fathers, both of all who went before and of all who followed after — one, and singular, and general — with which, rightly agreeing, blessed Gregory, pope of Rome, prelate of the apostolic see, the last indeed of the expounders but almost the most outstanding of all, answered thus in the fourth book of the Dialogues to the inquiry of his interlocutor, saying: « It is certain that the souls of the perfect just, as soon as they go out from the enclosure of this flesh, are received in the heavenly seats. Which Truth itself also attests by itself, saying: Wheresoever the body shall be, thither shall the eagles also be gathered together (Luc. XXVII, 37); for where our Redeemer himself is in body, thither are gathered also the souls of the just. And Paul desires to be dissolved, and to be with Christ. He, therefore, who does not doubt that Christ is in 1384Dheaven, will not deny that Paul's soul too is in heaven; who also, concerning the dissolution of his body and the habitation of the heavenly fatherland, says: We know that if our earthly house, having no inhabitant, falls to ruin, that we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, but eternal in the heavens. » (II Cor. V, 1.)

These things he said of the just and the perfect. But what of 1385Athe wicked? « Since, he says to his aforesaid interlocutor, you have believed, by the satisfaction of the sacred eloquence, that the souls of the saints are in heaven, it behooves that you believe in all respects that the souls of the wicked too are in hell; for by the recompense of the inward justice, from which the just are glorified, it is necessary in all respects that the unjust too be tormented. For as blessedness gladdens the elect, so it must be believed that from the day of their departure fire burns up the reprobate. » And all these things, of course, the same most truthful teacher showed not only by the sentences of words, but also by the examples of things. The same man, assuredly, narrated in the aforesaid book that the soul of Germanus the bishop was borne up into heaven by angels in a sphere of fire. The same, that the soul of blessed Benedict was led to the region above by a way strewn with palls. The same, that the soul of the paralytic little servant of the hospice 1385Bwas taken up by the inward praises of the heavens, and carried above their loftiest hinges. The same, that the soul of the holy virgin Scholastica was led to the ethereal 1386Abridal chamber in the likeness of a dove. The same, that the soul of the venerable Romula was taken up to everlasting life by heavenly obsequies. The same too he said, that the spirit of Gordiana his aunt was handed over to the fires of Gehenna. That the monk Hilliricianus, led down to the places of the regions below, saw the powerful and rich of this world hung in the midst of the flames. It is enough, it is sufficient. What one of the faithful can doubt any further about this matter? This witness too is very fit, against whose opinions to go is a sin. Wherefore I would have you warned, all of you whom that most unskilled man has attempted to lead astray from the heavenly wisdom by the windings of his lies, that, as you press toward the battle-line of faith, you be not turned aside from the journey you have begun by the shattered croaking of a little frog, but that you follow the most clearly resounding blare of the trumpet of the city above. 1386BThis is my prayer to God for you, this also my greeting to you. Amen.

On this text

The Latin is Migne's printing of Tractatus (PL 96, coll. 1379B–1386B), by Anonymous, from the Corpus Corporum transcription. Parenthetical references in small type stand on Migne's page — editorial identifications inherited from the edition he reprinted or supplied by his shop, not necessarily the author's own; the author's own citations run in the prose itself. Every gilt column mark is an address: migne.app/pl/96/1379b resolves to the first.