These are the edition's working notes, published as they were written. They record, work by work, where Migne's plate is defective or the reading uncertain: the printed form, what the English does with it, and why. They are not a groomed apparatus. Where a note argues with itself, withdraws an earlier decision, or leaves a question open, that is the record of how the reading was actually reached, and it is left standing — a conjecture that is visible can be checked, and one that has been tidied away cannot.
The English never silently repairs the page. A construable but wrong reading is rendered literally and the conjecture is recorded here, never applied to the text. How the English is produced and checked →
Merged 2026-08-01 from cruces-0000.md (Fable anchor), cruces-0001.md (chunks 0001–0005) and cruces-0006.md (chunks 0006–0009). The three source files follow verbatim below; this header is the authority where they disagree. Runbook step 4: the merge is a required step, and reconciling convention drift is its substance — concatenation is the easy half.
WORK-WIDE CONVENTIONS (authoritative)
Carried from the anchor, uncontested: speaker sigla ΓΡ./ΛΑΤ. → GR./LAT., one paragraph per turn · section letter-numerals as arabic + period · οὐσία = essence · φύσις = nature · ὑπόστασις = hypostasis · πρόσωπον = person · ἐκπόρευσις = procession · ὑπερ- compounds take "super-" · mentioned particles stay in Greek script, quoted credal clauses translated in quotation marks · a heading the plate carries but Calfa drops is restored as inline [ed:], never as a ## head.
Uncontested additions from the two halves: ἀγένητον = "ingenerate" vs ἀγέννητον = "unbegotten" (with the orthographic parentheses translated, the letter kept in Greek) · πρόοδος = "going-forth", never "procession" · ἐκπορευτόν = "proceeding" / "that which proceeds" · ἄμεσος/ἔμμεσος = immediate/mediate · ἀρχή = "principle" (hence ἄναρχος = "without principle", ὑπεράρχιος = "super-principial") · αἴτιον = "cause", kept distinct from ἀρχή · ὕφεσις = "diminution" · ὑπεράριθμος / ὑπερφυής / ὑπερταγής = super-numerical / super-natural / super-ordered · πατριά = "fatherhood" on the authority of Migne's own note (y) · homoousion carried untranslated in italics · γηγενάρχης / ἀγγελάρχης = head of the earth-born / chief of the angels · παρόμοιον = "nearly-like" (semi-Arian term, not "similar").
⚑ CONFLICTS RULED AT MERGE — the text was edited to match
The two halves settled the same vocabulary differently, and both renderings were live in the shipped English until this merge. This is the 11551 stylus/epistylium failure class: neither agent could see the other.
- The προβολ- family — RULED "put forth". - 0001–0005 had: προβάλλεσθαι = put forth · προβολεύς = putter-forth · προβλητικόν/πρόβλησις = putting-forth. - 0006–0009 had: προβάλλεσθαι = produce · προβολεύς = producer. - Ruling: the "put forth" family, throughout. Not by majority (20 vs 6) but on principle: Latin producere flattens three distinct Greek verbs here, and "produce" is simply the English of producere. Adopting it would import Allatius's flattening into our English through the back door — the precise thing PLAN.md rule 4 forbids. "Put forth" answers to no single Latin word. - Edited in the text:
0006.md— "producer/producer" → "putter-forth/ putter-forth" (the τίς ἡ διαφορὰ προβολέως καὶ προβολέως question, where the repetition IS the argument), "producing…produces" → "putting forth…puts it forth", and "not to beget or to produce" → "…or to put forth" (Greek: οὐ τὸ γεννᾷν ἢ προβάλλεσθαι).
- The προϊέναι family — RULED "send forth". - 0001–0005 had "emit" (2 sites); 0006–0009 had "send forth" (1 site). - Ruling: "send forth". Same principle: Allatius's own word here is emittere, and "emit" mirrors it. "Send forth" also keeps the author's deliberate near-synonymy with προβάλλεσθαι visible without collapsing the two verbs (0206 sets them in the same sentence: the Father puts forth mediately, the Son immediately sends forth the same). - Edited in the text:
0001.md"to put forth or to emit" → "…or to send forth";0002.md"he emits the Spirit" → "he sends forth the Spirit".
⚠ Trap recorded for future merges. cruces-0006.md states the προΐεσθαι convention citing col 0201 — but chunks 0006–0009 contain no προΐε- form under that spelling; the site is προῖεται (circumflex iota, no diaeresis), and both textbook προΐε- forms are in the peer's chunks. A merge that trusted the cruces prose without checking the Greek would have "reconciled" two correct renderings into a convention declared for a word the declaring agent never actually translated. Check the Greek, not the cruces claim.
Verified after merge
node scripts/verify-english-pg.mjs nicetas-maroneia-dialogi → 10 chunks, anchors + frontmatter + ratios + dedupe clean. No producer/produce or emit survives in the work; the προβολ- family reads 36 instances of the put-forth root, προϊέναι 4 of send-forth.
Work-wide conventions (anchor session, 2026-07-31 — merge into the work-wide section)
- Speaker sigla as printed: ΓΡ. → GR., ΛΑΤ. → LAT.; every turn its own paragraph, however short.
- Section letter-numerals used as section marks (αʹ, βʹ …) render as arabic numerals with a period ("1.", "2."), matching the plate's own Latin column ("1. GR."). In-prose letter-numerals remain English words (Joel rule, unchanged).
- Fixed technical equivalences — never varied within this work: οὐσία = essence · φύσις = nature · ὑπόστασις = hypostasis · πρόσωπον = person · ἐκπόρευσις = procession. The dialogue's whole argument runs on these distinctions; an elegant-variation synonym is a doctrinal error here.
- Dionysian ὑπερ- compounds take "super-" (super-divine, super-existence), after the traditional English "superessential."
- Mentioned prepositions stay in Greek script: where the TEXT discusses the particles themselves (τῆς ἐξ προθέσεως… καὶ τῆς διά), keep ἐξ / διά as printed. Quoted credal CLAUSES are translated in quotation marks ("from the Son", τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ). The plate itself prints the mention-form ἐξ (leaf 84, col 172D, verified) — Calfa's ἑξ is a breathing slip, not a dropped ἐκ.
- The Trinity takes "its": ἡ Τριάς is feminine; no English exponent (Pattern 9, not a defect).
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6): result for chunk 0000 — FINDINGS (not clean)
Read against src/pg-latin/nicetas-maroneia-dialogi/0000.md (cols 0170–0175) after drafting. Sites follow. No chunk in this batch was clean; this batch is chunk 0000 only.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English, Latin/plate cited
- 0169 διομένων → δεομένων ("questions REQUIRING more exact consideration"; Lat. indigentium).
- 0169 τυνεξετάσει → συνεξετάσει (Lat. disquisitio/disputatio context).
- 0169 ἰεοπαλής → ἰσοπαλής (Lat. paris ponderis).
- 0169 ὑποκειμένην ὄλην → ὕλην (Lat. propositam materiam).
- 0172 ἐπι. δείκνυσθαι → ἐπιδείκνυσθαι; δι' ἔνδει. ξιν → ἔνδειξιν (Calfa split type).
- 0172 πεοὶ → περί · συνἡθης → συνήθης · δείκννσιν → δείκνυσιν · ἐπαγόμεναν ῇ → ἐπαγόμενα ἢ (routine OCR, bundled).
- 0172 ἀδύνατονὐδὲ → ἀδύνατον (οὐδὲ… — Calfa dropped the opening parenthesis; plate prints it (leaf 84, col 172C, verified): (οὐδὲ γὰρ ἂν συνέβαινον ἑκατέρωθεν).
- 0172 παριστῶσι. διαμάχης — stray period splitting the clause; read παριστῶσι διαμάχης καὶ διαστάσεως together (Lat. causam esse aiunt … certaminis atque discidii).
- 0173 Intrusive-Κ artifact class, recurring in this volume's Calfa file: ΠνενύΚματος → Πνεύματος · Κγμνῶσκον → γινώσκον · ἐγκαινιζόΚμενον → ἐγκαινιζόμενον.
- 0173 θωτισμός → φωτισμός (plate-verified, leaf 85: φωτισμός).
- 0173 ὡλίνω → ὠδίνω ("in travail with"; Lat. anhelo; plate-verified, leaf 85).
- 0173 άραγγας → φάραγγας (Lat. valles; plate-verified, leaf 85; Isa 40:4 allusion, see twin notes (9)–(11)).
- 0173 Speaker tag ΓΙʹ → ΓΡ. (plate-verified, leaf 85: ΓΡ.).
- 0176 ἕτεροι → ἕτερον · ὑποστάσιις → ὑποστάσεις · υμφωνεῖν → συμφωνεῖν · μικοὰν → μικράν · ἕτεραε → ἕτερα; (routine OCR).
- 0176 Calfa truncation, completed from the twin: the Greek breaks mid-word — "ὁ Πατὴρ καὶ ὁ Υἱὸς καὶ τὸ Πνεῦμα ὑπο[ΛΑΤ.]" — dropping the end of GR.'s speech. Twin (col 0175): et rursum Pater et Filius et Spiritus sunt hypostases et personae divinitatis. English completes: "…are hypostases and persons of the Godhead." Sense certain from the Latin; exact Greek wording not recoverable from our files.
Pattern 13 — [ed:], digitization lost text the plate carries
- 0173 Between the proem's end and section αʹ the plate prints a centered cross-column heading ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ. / DIALOGUS PRIMUS. (leaf 85, plate-verified by render). Calfa omits it. Restored as an inline [ed:] — NOT as a
##head, which would break Greek↔English marker parity.
Borderline Pattern-16 case — logged, NO marker (§8 Q3 calibration datum)
- 0172 / twin 0171–0174: Greek "(οὐδὲ γὰρ ἂν συνέβαινον ἑκατέρωθεν)" ("for then they would not arise on both sides") vs Allatius "(secus enim nunquam concordassent)" ("otherwise they would never have agreed") — a real sense difference, but Migne's own note (c) on the Latin column corrects Allatius: "Equidem mallem: Secus enim non ab utraque parte acciderent vel resultarent; nimirum voce συμβαίνω ut paulo ante accepta." The Latin page corrects itself in its own apparatus, so a [lat:] would report as live a divergence the plate already adjudicates. English follows the Greek; no marker. Logged because the materiality boundary ("does the plate's own apparatus settle it?") is exactly what the pilot exists to calibrate.
Plate-apparatus notes carried by the twin (not ours to mark; future fontes/scripture harvest)
The plate's notes for this span, visible in the twin and on leaf renders: (2) Laur. ἐπιεικείᾳ · (3) Laur. διαλύειν · (4) Sic Laur., Maius omittit τοῦ λόγου · (5) Apud Maium: καὶ ἀλληλότερα · (6) I Cor. II, 10 · (7) Laur: περί · (8) Cod. V: λέγε; fort. λεγεις · (9) Isa. XL, 4 · (10) Psal. LI (Vulg. L.) 10 · (11) Isa. l.c. · (b)–(e) editorial (Maius, Etherianus cross-refs). Calfa strips all note anchors from the Greek, so the English carries no [n:] markers — the identifications survive in the committed twin.
Work-wide conventions of cruces-0000.md are in force and are not restated. This file adds only what chunks 0001–0005 forced. Scan used for every plate check below: raw/scans/pg139/patrologiaecurs63migngoog_djvu.xml, leaf index = position in the file's <OBJECT> sequence; for this span leaf n carries Migne cols (2n+3)/(2n+4) (leaf 89 = 181/182 … leaf 97 = 197/198), verified against the running heads. ⚠ Formula corrected 2026-08-01 — this file originally wrote it as (2n−7)/(2n−6), which contradicts its own worked examples (2·89−7 = 171, not 181). The examples were right, the formula wrong; a blind reader caught it while using it. Arithmetic in a method note gets checked against its own examples before it is trusted.
Conventions this batch had to decide (anchor did not cover)
- ἀγένητον vs ἀγέννητον is a live distinction in this work and the Latin column cannot carry it. Migne's Greek prints both, each with the author's own parenthetical gloss on its spelling:
τὸ ἀγένητον (δι᾿ ἑνὸς ν γραφόμενον)among the essential/natural attributes (0177), andτὸ ἀγέννητον (διὰ δύο γραφόμενον ν)among the hypostatic ones (0177). Allatius renders both ingenitum. English fixes ἀγένητον = "ingenerate", ἀγέννητον = "unbegotten", and the orthographic parentheses are translated with the letter kept in Greek script ("written with a single ν" / "written with two ν") — mention-not-use, per the anchor's ἐξ/διά rule. - The προβάλλεσθαι family, fixed: προβάλλεσθαι = "put forth" · προβολεύς = "putter-forth" · προβλητικόν = "the putting-forth" · πρόβλησις = "putting-forth" · προΐεσθαι = "emit". Allatius uses spirator / spiratio / producere / emittere interchangeably; we do not import that variation.
- πρόοδος = "going-forth", never "procession". ἐκπόρευσις is reserved for "procession" by the anchor's fixed-equivalence rule, and 0180 sets πρόοδος and ἐκπόρευσις in explicit contrast (
πρόοδός τίς ἐστιν ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ … καλεῖται δὲ καὶ οὗτος ἐκπόρευσις). Latin progressio / processio keeps the same split. - ἐκπορευτόν = "proceeding" (verbal adjective, substantivized as "the proceeding"), parallel to γεννητόν "begotten" / ἀγέννητον "unbegotten".
- ἄμεσος/ἔμμεσος = "immediate"/"mediate" throughout (Latin immediata / mediata). Note that Migne's own Latin-column note (p) at col 0196 attacks this very pair — "voces mediate et immediate, prout in hac materia usurpantur, non recte explanant" — i.e. the plate's editor is unhappy with Allatius's Latin here, not with the Greek. Logged, no marker.
[lat:] markers fired — 2
- 0185 (twin col 0186) — a NEGATION the two columns do not share. Greek:
ἀλλ᾿ οὐ σύνθεσις ἐκεῖ, ἀλλ᾿ ἁπλότης ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἁπλότητα, ὅτι μέρη ταῦτα τῆς θεότητος (ἀμερὴς γὰρ ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἀμέρειαν), ἀλλ᾿ ἰδιότητες…Latin: "Verum non est compositio ibi, sed simplicitas super omnem simplicitatem, quia nec partes Divinitatis ista sunt quum ea sit super omnem indivisibilitatem indivisibilis, verum proprietates…" PLATE-VERIFIED on the Greek side (leaf 91): the scan's independent OCR readsὅτι µέρη ταῦτα τῆς θεότητος (ἀμερὴς γὰρ ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἀμέρειαν)— noοὐ, parenthesis present. So the Greek plate prints the sentence without the negative that its ownἀλλ᾿ ἰδιότητεςrequires; the Latin column supplies it. English follows the printed Greek ("because these are parts of the Godhead") and marks the Latin. Corroboration that the omission is the plate's and not a Calfa drop: the exactly parallel sentence at col 0188 (chunk 0003) does print the negative —ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ οὐσία ταῦτα … οὐδὲ μέρη τῆς οὐσίας· ἡ θεότης γὰρ ἀμερής— so the author's formula normally carries it. This is the dropped-negative class Pattern 7 exists to expose. - 0189/0190 (twin col 0190) — the reciprocal-ratio terms. Greek (plate-verified, leaf 93):
νῦν μὲν γινομένη τὸ ἥμισυ καὶ τὸ ὑποδιπλάσιον, νῦν δὲ τρίτον καὶ ὑποτριπλάσιον, νῦν δὲ τέταρτον καὶ ὑποτε[τρα]πλάσιον. Latin: "nunc quidem fit dimidium et duplum, nunc vero tertium et triplum, nunc quartum et quadruplum." Allatius drops the ὑπο-, which turns each pair from two names for the same ratio (half = subduple) into two opposite ratios (half and double). A reader of the Latin column takes away a different mathematical claim, so this clears Pattern 16's materiality bar. Numeral-class, so the Greek was plate-checked before the marker fired, perpg-paired-pilot.md§4.
Logged, NO marker — the plate's own apparatus or column concurrence settles it
- 0185 (twin 0184) — Migne flags the Greek himself.
τὸ Πνεῦμα ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ ἀμέσως ὡς μέση προβάλλεσθαι— feminine, agreeing with nothing. The plate (leaf 91) printsὡς μέση (15), and the numeric note reads "Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur." The page has already adjudicated it. Rendered "as being intermediate" (gender has no English exponent, Pattern 9); Allatius simply omits the phrase. - 0184 (twin 0183) — the μὲν/δέ that reverses the doctrine.
ὅτι καὶ ἀμέσως καὶ ἐμμέσως ἐκπορεύεται, τὸ μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, τὸ δὲ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ— taken positionally this gives immediately from the Father, mediately from the Son, the exact reverse of the position argued three lines earlier and again eight lines later (ἐμμέσως δηλαδὴ καὶ ἀμέσως, of Father then Son). Plate-verified, leaf 91, same order. Latin declines to map at all ("scilicet tum ex Patre, tum ex Filio") — so no material divergence and no marker. Rendered in the printed order. NB the author's μὲν/δέ pairs are demonstrably non-positional here: col 0181 (leaf 89, verified) printsὡς μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, ὡς δὲ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, τουτέστιν ἀμέσως μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ— the gloss crosses its own μέν/δέ. Recorded because it is exactly the kind of reading a later reader will suspect us of having smoothed. - 0195 (twin 0194) — "second" for "third", both columns.
καὶ πρὸς μὲν τὴν πρώτην νοεῖται … τὸ δεξιὸν ἔχουσα μέρος, πρὸς δὲ τὴν δευτέραν τὸ εὐώνυμον— the middle of three monads cannot be left of the second; the parallel sentence immediately above correctly hasπρὸς μὲν τὴν πρώτην … πρὸς δὲ τὴν τρίτην. Plate-verified, leaf 95, and Allatius prints "relate vero ad secundam" — the two columns concur. Ladder row 3 (attributable to the plate pair). Rendered literally. - 0184 (twin 0183) — Migne's Latin flagged in its own apparatus. Greek
ἀλλ᾿ ἐκεῖνό γε ἄτοπον; Latin "Attamen illud certe absurdum ostendit, quod non dicam", carrying note "Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur." The Latin, not the Greek, is what the page doubts. No marker. - 0197 note (p), col 0196 (leaf 96) — Migne's own criticism of Allatius's mediate/immediate, quoted under Conventions above. Apparatus, not ours.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English
Negations and lost parentheses (the load-bearing class — every one checked against the plate before it was restored):
- 0196 (chunk 0005), plate-verified leaf 96 — a DROPPED NEGATION in our file, not Migne's. Calfa:
οὐχ ὡς χρόνου τινὸς μεσιτεύοντος γὰρ πρῶτον μὲν γεννᾷ τὸν Υἱόν…. Plate:οὐχ ὡς χρόνου τινὸς μεσιτεύοντος (οὐ γὰρ πρῶτον μὲν γεννᾷ τὸν Υἱόν, εἶτα διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα προβάλλεται). Calfa lost(οὐas one unit — opening parenthesis plus negative, the anchor's 0172 class. Latin concurs ("neque enim Pater prius generat Filium…"). Restored. Recorded prominently: this is a case where the negation is missing from OUR file and the standing PG rule (never attribute to the plate from our files alone) was the thing that kept it from becoming a false[lat:]. - 0189/0190 (chunk 0003), plate-verified leaf 93 — Calfa
τὸ Πνεῦμαὐ γὰρ μέρη τοῦ Πατρὸς ταῦτα; plateτὸ Πνεῦμα (οὐ γὰρ μέρη τοῦ Πατρὸς ταῦτα, οὐδὲ κατὰ τομήν τινα καὶ ῥοὴν ἡ ἑκάστου γνωρίζεται πρόοδος). Same(οὐ-loss. Restored. - 0196 (chunk 0004), plate-verified leaf 94 — Calfa
ἐμμέσως δὲ ἐκ τοῦ ἡλίου τῶν ἀκτίνων γὰρ; plateἐμμέσως δὲ ἐκ τοῦ ἡλίου (διὰ τῶν ἀκτίνων γάρ). A droppedδιάinside a lost parenthesis — in this work, the work whose whole dispute is ἐξ vs διά. Restored; Latin concurs ("videlicet per radios"). - 0192/0193 (chunk 0004) — parentheses lost, no negation at risk, restored from sense + Latin:
ἡ ἐκπόρευσις (διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ γάρ);τοῦτο γὰρ καὶ οἱ Πατέρες φασί…;πρὸς ἄλληλα (ὑπὲρ σύνθεσιν γὰρ ἡ ἑνότης αὐτῶν);σύνταξις (ἦν γὰρ ἂν καὶ ἡ τῆς ὅλης Τριάδος σύνταξις σύνθεσις). Latin prints all four parentheses.
Lost speaker tags, section marks and lost text (structural):
- 0181 (chunk 0001) — a whole speech-opening lost. Calfa prints
…ἵνα γνῶ καὶ αὐτός. [0181] Πνεῦμα] ἐκπορεύεται καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, συγκέχυται…— section mark, speaker tag and the protasis opening all gone, leaving a stray]. Plate (leaf 89, verified):δʹ. ΓΡ. Εἰ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον τὸ Πνεῦμα ἐκπορεύεται καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, συγκέχυται…Restored silently per the anchor's 0176 precedent. Section number: the scan's own OCR renders the letter-numeral "5." there, but the Latin column prints 4. GR. and the printed sequence is 2 (0176) → 3 (0180) → [this] → 5 (0184,εʹpresent in Calfa), so it is δʹ = 4; the djvu "5." is OCR noise for δʹ. English prints "4. GR." - Speaker sigla mangled, all restored (each is the anchor's ΓΙʹ→ΓΡ. class): 0176
ΙΡ.→ΓΡ. · 0177ΜΑΤ.→ΛΑΤ.,ΚΓΡ.→ΓΡ.,ΠΡ.→ΓΡ. · 0181ΛΓΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0184Κσʹ. ΓΡ.→ϛʹ. ΓΡ.(intrusive-Κ class; = 6, Latin 6. GR.) · 0197ΛΔΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0200ΚΛΑΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0200ΓΡ.(→ΓΡ. (the(is note-anchor residue; the plate carries note (29)/(s) there). - 0176 (chunk 0001) —
ἀλλ᾿ οὐ σύνθετος… τηἐκπρευτὸν→τὸ ἐκπορευτόν;μόον→μόνον;ἀγγέννητος→ἀγέννητος (0184).
Intrusive-Κ artifact class (the anchor's ΠνενύΚματος class, still running): 0177 Κτὴν ὑπεράγαθον→τὴν · 0184 Κγεννητὸς→γεννητός · 0189 περὶ Καὐτήν→αὐτήν, τῷ λόγῳ Κδιακέκριται→διακέκριται, Κγινομένη→γινομένη, σχεΚδόν→σχεδόν, ἄγνωστόν Κτε→τε · 0193 Κφῶς→φῶς · 0200 Κφαινόμενα→ φαινόμενα.
Routine OCR, bundled (no sense at issue): 0176 Οὔτω γὰρἔδοξε, ἐοτιν, ταύτόν, Πατοὶ καὶ ἰἵῷ, υσικά, κατ᾿ οὐείαν, ἁλλά, ἑπί, ἀτδιον, ἀπερίγοαπτον, φυσικἀ, κοινῷς, Ὑπόσασιν, δηλαόή, ἀνυπἑλάκτως→ ἀνυπαλλάκτως, Υἱνῦ, ἷέννησιν, Πατοὸς, τοῦΓἰνεύαατος, Ἑνος→μόνος (Lat. solus … Unigenitus), ἔκν τινος, Υὸς, καθ᾿ δν, Υἱλν, εἰαί→εἰμί, ἐξεκάλυύε→ἐξεκάλυψε, Υλοῦ, Ινεύματος · 0184 χεννῶν, πρυνθάλλεται, Πεῦμα, ἐκπορεύόται, Ποῦ→Υἱοῦ, Γίοῦ, μόναν→μόνον, Κυρίον, λατήρ→Πατήρ, ἐχόντοιν οὐδ᾿ Ἀν ἀνομάτων→οὐδ᾿ ἐν ὀνομάτων, Κἰ γάρ→Εἰ γάρ, παναγίευ, ἐσὶ→ἐπί, Σὲ→δέ, Ἰδιότης · 0188–0192 σύνθισιν, λἱός, ἐκπορετόν→ἐκπορευτόν, παριληπτικον→περιληπτικόν, ψποστάσεων, ἰὸιότητας, προῖοῦτοα Κἐ ἐογειαν→προϊοῦσαν ἐνέργειαν, ἀλλδμως ὅλλο→ἀλλ᾿ ὅμως ἄλλο, ἀριθμοῖς, τρίο ναὶ ὑποτοιπλάσιον→τρίτον καὶ ὑποτριπλάσιον, τετράγωνες, ποντάγωνος, φεινομένη, ἄπλουστάηη, ὑποσπτάσεων, ἐνυΤαρχούσης, συνθςτοις, τὸ!] εῦμα→τὸ Πνεῦμα · 0193–0196 ἐκπρρελόμενον, Πεὖμα, Ιρῶτον, ῦτο γάρ→τοῦτο γάρ, Ιἱός, Θ γάρ→Ἢ γάρ, ἐκτοῦ ΥΙοῦ, ακρων, τριων, νεύματος→Πνεύματος, κ τοῦ ΙΙατρὸς→ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός · 0197–0200 ἡ οὲ→ἡ δέ, ατελής, ἐκπύρευσις/ἐκπίρευσιν, τοῦΠατρός, διαροράν, παρεμφαίνουσ, Ὁμὲν, Ιατρός/Γατρός, Οίοῦ, χωοίζονται, ἐκ τοῶ Πασοός, Ὥοπερ, ἕκαστυν, Υἱλς, δτι, συνορῷ, Ἱσως, Πνεῦρα το ἅγιον, εἴῷ, λἱοῦ, υἱωνὸςὲ→υἱωνὸς δέ, φθέγγεσθνι, ἐκατερα, ἐν τῷ αὐτῳ, αὐτων, ποὸς.
One correction taken on plate authority against Calfa: 0196 (chunk 0004) Calfa Τῆς γὰρ μονᾶς ὁποτερασοῦν οὔσης τελείας; plate (leaf 96, verified) Τῆς γὰρ μιᾶς ὁποτερασοῦν οὔσης τελείας, Latin "Si enim una…". Rendered "the one of them, whichever it be". Left unmarked because the plate settles it; worth noting only because μονάς is a live technical term four lines earlier and a reader might expect it here.
Pattern 7 non-word type carried into the English
- 0181 — προεκτικόν.
τὸ γεννητικὸν καὶ προβλητικὸν ἤτοι προεκτικόν, εἰ οὕτω χρὴ λέγειν. Not an attested Greek word (προετικός, from προΐημι, is what the sense and the Latin sive emissio want). Both OCRs of the plate — Calfa and the scan's own (leaf 89) — readπροεκτικόν, and the author's ownεἰ οὕτω χρὴ λέγειν("if one must so speak") shows he knows he is coining. Carried in italics untranslated per Pattern 7's non-word rule rather than silently read as προετικόν. Conjecture recorded here.
Scripture quoted in these chunks — divergences from the received text: NONE
Two only, both verbatim against the received Greek text, both matching the Latin column:
- 0184 John 10:30 —
Ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν(Calfaλατήρ, OCR; plate leaf 91 clean). Lat. Ego et Pater unum sumus. - 0193 John 14:11 —
Ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ Πατρὶ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί. Lat. Ego in Patre et Pater in me. There is one non-scriptural named authority: 0196,κατὰ τὸν σοφὸν Διονύσιον(ps.-Dionysius, De div. nom.), where the plate carries variant note (24) "Cod. ἀδύνατον" against ourἀδύναμον— apparatus, not a divergence. The florilegium of patristic testimonies is later in the work; the first five chunks reach it only through this one Dionysian tag.
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6) — per-chunk result
Every chunk got the deliberate post-draft pass against its twin. Outcome:
- 0001 — findings (twin cols 0178–0182): the lost section-4 opening (restored from the plate + twin); the
ἐκπορευτόν-list where Allatius collapses ἀγένητον/ἀγέννητον to a single ingenitum; twin's own OCR lacunae at cols 0179 (Filii generationem, qua neque genitus— words dropped) and (ritus sanctus est procedens— head of solus enim Spiritus dropped), which are defects in the VERIFIER and are not divergences. - 0002 — findings:
[lat:]#1 (the 0185 negation) + three no-marker adjudications (μέση, the μὲν/δέ reversal, the quod non dicam note). Also theἸμεῖς→ἡμεῖς restoration at 0184, settled by the twin's first-person dicimus (itacism class; no marker fired, so no plate check was required, and none was taken). - 0003 — findings:
[lat:]#2 (the ὑπο- ratios); the lost(οὐ γὰρ μέρηparenthesis; the corroborating negated parallel at col 0188 that made the 0185 finding attributable. Alsoκαθά φατε καὶ ὑμεῖς(0188) — the other pronoun-itacism class — confirmed by the twin's secundum quod et vos dicitis; no marker, no plate check needed. - 0004 — findings: the plate-verified
(διὰ τῶν ἀκτίνων γάρ)restoration; theπρὸς δὲ τὴν δευτέρανconcurrence;μονᾶς→μιᾶς. The twin for cols 0195–0196 is line-interleaved by the column crop (the run beginning "neque enim simplicibus simplicitas essentia … qui vero circa essentiam sunt, licet unius … reddunt" is not continuous prose) and was treated as unusable for that stretch rather than read as divergence — flagging this for pilot §8 Q1: the twin's sanity gate is word-count-based and would not catch an interleave. - 0005 — findings: the plate-verified
(οὐ γὰρrestoration at col 0196. Otherwise the columns run together closely.
No chunk in this batch came back clean. Reporting that plainly, since the pilot asks for it: 0/5 clean, and in four of the five the finding was a defect in our file rather than a divergence between Migne's columns — which is the result the standing PG attribution rule predicts and the reason the twin plus the plate were both needed.
Plate apparatus visible in the twin for this span (not ours to mark)
Numeric notes (Greek column): (15) Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur. [on μέση, 0184] · (16) Cod. Vat. f. 5,6, mendose, ὑπόθεσις · (18) Cod. Vat. Ἐκπορεύεται · (19) marginal, Gk: Ἐνταῦθα εἰσαγωγὴ ἑτέρου ἀτόπου ὅτι διπλῆ ἔσται ἡ τοῦ Πνεύματος ἐκπόρευσις… · (21) Frequen[ter]… · (23) marginal, Gk: Ἕτερον ἄτοπον ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευομένου τοῦ Πνεύματος, ἢ ἀτελὴς ἡ ἐκπόρευσις ἑκατέρα ἢ περιττὴ ἡ ἑτέρα · (24) Cod. ἀδύνατον · (26) Vat. εἰ · (28) Vat. τελείων · (29) marginal, Gk: Ἕτερον ἄτοπον, ὅτι εἰ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα υἱὸς ἔσται τοῦ Υἱοῦ. Letter notes (Latin column): (f) Elias of Crete on Greg. Naz. or. 11 + Arist. Metaph. IV · (k) S. Maximus, Opusc. theol. et polem. II p. 155 ed. Combefis; ps.-Justin Expos. rectae fidei n. 3 · (m)/(4) on προβάλλεσθαι being middle, not passive · (n)/(o) the two marginal aliud absurdum notes, (o) adding the cross-reference to Photius, De Spiritus sancti mystagogia c. 7 and Nicholas of Methone c. 11 for the Greek's fourth argument · (p) Haec sane non satis accurate dicta sunt + the attack on mediate / immediate · (q), (r) (imitatur Gregorii Nazianzeni responsum or. 27) · (s) Quintum argumentum. Calfa strips all note anchors from the Greek, so the English carries no [n:] markers; the identifications survive in the committed twin and are listed here for the eventual fontes/scripture harvest.
Second half of the work (chunks 0006–0009 of 10). Chunks 0001–0005 were held by a peer agent who could not see this file; the merge is a required later step, not done here. Conventions below are the anchor's (cruces-0000.md) unless flagged as decided fresh.
Method note — what "plate-verified" means in this batch
The Latin twin was cropped from raw/scans/pg139/patrologiaecurs63migngoog_djvu.xml by x-range split. The same leaves carry Migne's GREEK column in that XML, and its OCR is independent of Calfa's. Every reading marked plate-verified below was checked against the Greek column of the named leaf (leaves 98–108 = cols 0201–0221), so the evidence is a second witness to the plate, not a second reading of our own file. Where the scan OCR is itself illegible at the point at issue, that is said.
Conventions carried from the anchor (unchanged)
Speaker sigla ΓΡ./ΛΑΤ. → GR./LAT., one paragraph per turn · section letter-numerals as arabic + period · οὐσία = essence, φύσις = nature, ὑπόστασις = hypostasis, πρόσωπον = person, ἐκπόρευσις = procession · ὑπερ- compounds take "super-" · mentioned particles stay in Greek script, quoted credal clauses translated in " ".
Conventions decided fresh (flag for the merge)
These terms first fall due in this half of the work; the peer's half may have settled some of them differently.
- ἀρχή = "principle" throughout, including where English would prefer "beginning" or "origin" — the whole of §§2–4 turns on ἀρχή/ἄναρχος/ὑπεράρχιος being one word. Consequently ἄναρχος = "without principle" (Lat. principii expers) and ὑπεράρχιος = "super-principial".
- αἴτιον = "cause" (never "principle"), kept distinct from ἀρχή because 0213 sets them side by side: καὶ ἀρχὴ καὶ ἀρχή, καὶ οὐ δύο ἀρχαί, οὐδὲ δύο τὰ αἴτια.
- προβολεύς = "producer" · προβάλλεσθαι = "to produce" · προΐεσθαι = "to send forth" — three distinct words for the Latin's single producere; kept apart because 0201 contrasts οὐδὲν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα προΐεται with τὸ ἑτέρας ὑποστάσεως προετικόν.
- ὕφεσις = "diminution" (Lat. minoratio).
- γεννητόν = "that which is begotten" · ἐκπορευτόν = "that which proceeds", and ἐκπορευτόν predicatively = "capable of proceeding" (0212: οὐδὲ ἐκπορευτὸν ὅλως).
- ὑπερ- compounds coined in this half: ὑπεράριθμος = "super-numerical", ὑπερφυής = "super-natural" (hyphenated, to keep it visibly a compound and not the ordinary English word), ὑπερταγής = "super-ordered".
- πατριά = "fatherhood" at 0209, on the authority of Migne's own note (y) on that column: Πατριὰ hic non est genus, gens, origo, sed paternitas, ut Ephes. III, 15, ad quem textum alluditur. The plate settles it; no conjecture of ours.
- ὁμοούσιον carried untranslated in italics as homoousion at 0217 — the word is the subject of the sentence as a word ("which is one single word of the creed"), so an English equivalent would dissolve the argument. Mention-vs-use rule, extended from particles to this one term.
- γηγενάρχης = "head of the earth-born" · ἀγγελάρχης = "chief of the angels" (Lat. terrigenarum generis princeps, angelorum princeps).
- παρόμοιον rendered "nearly-like" at 0205 — the semi-Arian term in a list of words the heretics use; "similar" (Lat. simile) would lose that it is a technical slogan.
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6) — result by chunk
Performed after drafting, against src/pg-latin/nicetas-maroneia-dialogi/000[6-9].md.
- 0006 — findings (one [var:], one numeral candidate logged unfired, OCR class).
- 0007 — findings (one [lat:] fired; one polarity repair on our side).
- 0008 — findings (three lost headings, one lost editorial bridge, OCR class).
- 0009 — CLEAN on the divergence test. Every fact, name, negation and clause in col. 0221 is asserted alike by both columns; the only Latin departures are Allatius's routine looseness (et confitemur added to the closing sentence, which the Greek does not print) and readings Migne's own notes (78)–(79) already record. No
[lat:], no crux beyond the OCR list below.
No chunk in this batch was clean of Calfa OCR damage. The twin pass found no "Greek made no sense and the Latin explains why" case that the plate's own Greek column did not settle more directly.
Pattern 16 — [lat: …] fired: ONE
- 0212 / twin col. 0211. Greek: Οὗτος ὁ λόγος δείκνυσιν οὐχ ὅτι μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, ἀλλ' ὅτι μηδὲ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορεύεται, μηδὲ ὅλως ἐκπορευτόν ἐστι. Allatius: Hec ratiocinatio ostendit, non quod procedit ex Filio, sed quod neque ex Patre procedit, neque omnino procedens est. The Latin has no equivalent of the Greek's μή. Plate-verified: leaf 103, Greek column, reads δείκνυσιν οὐχ ὅτι μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ — the negative is on the plate, not a Calfa intrusion. The divergence is material and doctrinal: on the Greek the Latin speaker concedes that the Greek's reductio disproves the denial of procession from the Son as much as the assertion of it (μηδέ then escalates: "nor from the Father either"); on Allatius he concedes only that it fails to prove procession from the Son. English follows the Greek; marker fired. Migne prints no note adjudicating this column, so the plate's own apparatus does not settle it (contrast the anchor's concordassent case).
Pattern 16 — candidates LOGGED, marker NOT fired
- 0205 / twin col. 0206 — section numeral εʹ vs Latin "6." Greek plate-verified as εʹ (leaf 100, Greek column: ε'. Ἡ τοίνυν τάξις), and Calfa agrees. The Latin column's numeral OCRs as "6." at 85% confidence in a typeface where 5 and 6 are confusable, on a rough crop. Per the standing rule that numerals need the Greek plate-verified before a marker fires, the Greek side is clean — but the Latin side here is the unverified one, and firing on it would manufacture a divergence out of crop noise. The Latin column also drops the δʹ mark entirely two sections earlier, which is enough to explain a one-off numbering slip. Logged; no marker; a leaf render would settle it in a minute if anyone wants it.
- 0216 / twin col. 0215 — Ἐπίσχες vs Retinuisti. Greek imperative "Hold back, O Greek" (plate leaf 105: Ἐπίσχε, imperative); Allatius gives the aorist indicative, "You have held back, O Greek." A real construal difference, but it is Allatius reading an ambiguous form one letter differently, which is the far end of his ordinary freedom rather than a different fact about the transmission. Logged; no marker. This is a materiality-boundary datum for pilot §8 Q3: mood/person shifts on an ambiguous form are being treated as looseness, not divergence.
- 0221 / twin col. 0222 — the closing sentence. Migne's note (79) records that Allatius's own version read quod satis utrisque, nobis et vobis, amorem conciliabit against the printed Satis … consensio in unum … erit. The plate has already adjudicated its own Latin, per the anchor's rule; logged, no marker. The printed Latin agrees with the Greek.
Pattern 14 — [var: …] fired: TWO (the divergence list)
Both are quotations Migne prints in a form the received text does not carry. These are the most valuable findings in the batch, and the search for them was word-by-word against the plate, not against memory.
- 0204, John 14:28. Migne's Greek prints Ὁ Πατήρ ΜΟΥ μείζων μου ἐστίν — with the possessive on Father as well as on the comparative. Plate-verified: leaf 98, Greek column, Ὁ Πατήρ μου μείζων μου ἐστίν (33), note (33) = Joan. xiv, 28. The received NT text is ὁ πατὴρ μείζων μού ἐστιν, with one μου only. Allatius's column carries the doubled possessive too (Pater meus major me est), so both columns concur against the received text — ladder row 3, the two-witness case. Rendered as Migne prints it ("My Father is greater than I");
[var: Gk. …]. - 0221, the creed. Migne prints the clause the Greek speaker urges on the Latins as τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συνδοξαζόμενον — one verb. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan text has two, συμπροσκυνούμενον καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον. Plate-verified: leaf 108, Greek column, τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συνδοξαζόμενον εἴπατε; the Latin column likewise gives only qui cum Patre et Filio simul glorificatur. Both columns concur; rendered as printed;
[var: …]. Worth noting for whoever merges: the anchor's chunk 0000 uses the full doubled formula in the proem (συμπροσκυνούμενον … καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον), so this is a divergence inside the work, not a house style — do not harmonize the two at merge time.
Pattern 13 — [ed: …], text the DIGITIZATION lost that the plate carries
This work is Hergenröther's set of fragments of dialogues II–VI, and its structural furniture is exactly what Calfa strips. Five centered division headings and two editorial bridges are gone from our Greek. All are restored as [ed: …], never as ## heads (marker parity with the Greek chunk), following the anchor's ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ precedent.
- 0201 (leaf 98) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΣ / DIALOGUS SECUNDUS, plus the section mark αʹ that follows it and governs ΛΑΤ. Ἐπηγγείλω. The heading is set as two centered lines spanning the gutter, which is why the crop split it (ΛΟΓΟΣ + DIALOGUS on the Greek side, ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΣ (30) + SECUNDUS on the Latin). The αʹ is restored silently as "1." — routine, plate-verified, and the Latin column prints "1." too.
- 0204 (leaf 99) — editorial bridge before Τὸ μεῖζον ἄρα: our Greek runs the two speeches together across the column anchor. The Latin twin at col. 0203 carries it (Sequitur prolixa de hoc argumento tractatio … deinde in Vatic., cod. 1115 f. 11 b. med. Latinus).
[ed:]describes the loss; nothing of the Latin's wording is imported into the running text. - 0205 (leaf 100) — the clause καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ πρότερον… is truncated by Calfa to καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ α, which then fuses with the initial Ἵν- of the next sentence: Calfa reads καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ α δὲ ὁ λόγος ἐξεταστικώτερος γένηται, a non-sentence. Plate: καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ πρότερον… [ed. bridge] …Ἵνα δὲ ὁ λόγος ἐξεταστικώτερος γένηται. πρότερον restored silently; the bridge marked
[ed:]. - 0212 (leaves 102–103) — the closing speech of the Latin, ΛΑΤ. Ἔστω καὶ ταῦτα, καθά σοι δοκεῖ· ἐχέτω πέρας ὡδὶ ἡ παροῦσα διάλεξις, is dropped whole by Calfa, and with it ΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΡΙΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS TERTIUS. The speech is plate-verified in the Greek column (leaf 102) and corroborated by the twin (LAT. Sint et hec, ut tibi videtur, et habeat hic disputatio finem presens), so it is rendered in the running text — ladder row 1, as the anchor did at 0176 — and an
[ed:]says plainly that our source drops it, so no reader meets a restored speech unmarked. - 0213 (leaf 103) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS QUARTUS.
- 0216 (leaf 105) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΕΜΠΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS QUINTUS.
- 0217 (leaf 105) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΚΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS SEXTUS.
- 0217 (leaf 106) — editorial bridge between the Greek's two consecutive speeches (Deinde Latinus multa profert pro sua sententia … Postea Graecus ita prosequitur). Marked because without it the page shows GR. answering GR., which reads as our bug.
Fragment boundaries as found: dialogue II opens at col. 0201/0202 and the work runs to a stop at col. 0221 in mid-argument, where PG 139 turns to the next author (Joannes of Citrus). Ellipses (…) inside the Greek are Hergenröther's own and are reproduced as printed; no gap anywhere was bridged with invented connective prose.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English
Itemized inline these would drown the text (register rule). Grouped by column. Unless marked otherwise, the correction is confirmed by the plate's Greek column on the leaf named in the section head above.
Polarity- and sense-bearing (these are the ones that mattered):
- 0209 περίγραπτος → ἀπερίγραπτος. Calfa prints οὐδὲ τοπικὴν θέσιν — περίγραπτος γὰρ ἡ Τριὰς καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντα τόπον, i.e. "circumscribed, for the Trinity is circumscribed and above every place" — the exact opposite of the argument, and self-contradicting within its own parenthesis. Calfa has swallowed the opening (ἀ. Plate (leaf 102): (ἀπερίγραπτος ἡ Τριὰς καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντα τόπον); twin: incircumscripta est enim Trinitas et super omnem locum. Two independent witnesses; corrected. This is the single most dangerous defect in the batch — it is invisible once translated, it makes a grammatical English sentence, and it inverts a doctrinal predicate.
- 0201 οὐκ ἀλίνα δείέομεν → οὐκ ὀλίγα δείξομεν, "we shall show not a few." The scan's Greek OCR drops the οὐκ (reads ὀλίγα), so on the plate side alone the sense would be "a few"; Calfa and the twin (eaque non pauca) both carry the negation, and it is the negation that makes the sentence a threat rather than a concession. Kept. Recorded here because it is a case where the plate OCR is the witness that dropped a negative.
- 0201 ὄφεσις → ὕφεσις ("diminution"). Both OCRs read ὄφεσις, which is not a Greek word; the twin gives minoratio, and the same word recurs correctly as ἡ ὕφεσις four columns later (0205, both witnesses). Corrected as a non-word, not as a reading we prefer.
- 0209 τοῖς τρισίν → ταῖς τρισίν (plate); no English exponent, recorded only so the merge is not surprised.
- 0209 διαφορά → διαφοράς (plate; twin secundum differentias).
- 0220 Calfa's column-break hole: it prints πολλαὶ ἀμφιβολίαι μετὰ [0220] συμβόλου λέξις ἐστί, having lost the run that bridges leaves 106→107. Plate: … μετὰ ταῦτα περὶ τοῦ ὁμοουσίου γεγόνασιν, ὅπερ μία συμβόλου λέξις ἐστί; twin: multa postmodum de homousio quae una tantummodo symboli dictio est, dubia essent exorta. Restored silently from the plate (not from the twin); the whole clause about the homoousion — the analogy on which the speaker's entire argument against additions rests — was absent from our Greek.
- 0221 Calfa prints εἰς τὸ μέδιαιρέσεως αἴτιον, fusing across a lost run. Plate (leaves 107–108): εἰς τὸ μέσον κοινόν, καὶ σχίσματος τοσούτου καὶ διαιρέσεως αἴτιον; twin: neque scandalum commune in medium introducere, quod tanti schismatis et divisionis causa sit. Restored from the plate.
Speaker sigla mangled by Calfa (all restored, all plate-verified): 0201 ΠΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0201 ΑΑΤ. → ΛΑΤ.; 0201 ΤΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0204 ΛΛΤ. → ΛΑΤ.; 0213 λΑΤ → ΛΑΤ.; 0216 ΕΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0216 ΛΑΤ.θ → ΛΑΤ.; 0212 ΑΑΤ. → ΛΑΤ. 0213: Calfa drops the ΓΡ. tag entirely before Πάραγε δή μοι καὶ ταῦτα, silently handing the Greek's speech to the Latin; the plate (leaf 104) and the twin (GR. Profer jam mihi) both carry it. Restored.
Section marks: 0205 νʹ → γʹ ("3.") — plate leaf 99 reads γ'., twin reads 3.; Calfa's ν is an OCR of γ, and left standing it would have printed "50." in the English. 0201 αʹ restored (lost with the heading, above).
The intrusive-Κ class (already named in the anchor's cruces for chunk 0000, and still running at this end of the volume): 0209 Κθεοί → θεοί · 0209 Κγὰρ → γάρ · 0213 Κἵκα → ἵνα · 0213 Κἐμφαῖνον → ἐμφαῖνον · 0217 Κῥνωθεν → ἄνωθεν · 0217 Κἐτράνωσεν → ἐτράνωσεν · 0220 Κσυμβόλῳ → συμβόλῳ.
Dropped opening parenthesis class (same defect as the anchor's 0172 ἀδύνατονὐδὲ): 0209 ἁπασῶνπὲρ φύσιν → ἁπασῶν (ὑπὲρ φύσιν · 0209 ἁπασῶνκὲρ τάξιν → ἁπασῶν (ὑπὲρ τάξιν · 0209 διαίρεσιν παρεισάγουσαα γὰρ ἡ φύσις → διαίρεσιν παρεισάγουσα (μία γὰρ ἡ φύσις · 0209 θέσινπερίγραπτος → θέσιν (ἀπερίγραπτος (see above) · 0209 τὸ ἅμαν οἷς γὰρ → τὸ ἅμα (ἐν οἷς γὰρ.
Routine letter-level damage, bundled (correction ← Calfa): 0201 ἀναλαβόντες kept (Calfa's reading; the scan's Greek OCR gives only λαβόντες, but the twin's disputationem resumentes wants the ἀνα-) · 0201 ἑτοπα → ἄτοπα · 0201 ἐκτοῦ → ἐκ τοῦ · 0201 ατρὸς → Πατρὸς · 0201 ἐχόντοιν kept (genitive dual, both witnesses — not an error) · 0201 Πατοὸς → Πατρὸς · 0204 θΗατήρ → Ὁ Πατήρ · 0204 εἴῃνε → εἴληχε · 0204 φατὲ/φατέ as printed · 0205 ὁ ὸς → ὁ Υἱὸς · 0205 Ἀ δὲ Πατὴρ → ὁ δὲ Πατὴρ · 0205 Ιει → ἕξει · 0205 Μακεἐόνιος → Μακεδόνιος · 0205 ποοὸν → ποσόν · 0208 ποότερον → πρότερον · 0208 λέ, εται → λέγεται · 0208 τὰ κῶ γράμματα → τὰ κδʹ γράμματα (twenty-four; plate κδ', twin Viginti quatuor — a letter-numeral, verified on both sides before rendering) · 0209 Δδάμ → Ἀδάμ · 0209 Ἀιχαὴλ → Μιχαὴλ · 0209 ἀν οὐρανοῖς → ἐν οὐρανοῖς · 0209 θεαρχκῆς → θεαρχικῆς · 0209 όῦτως → οὕτως · 0209 Τίοῦ → Υἱοῦ · 0212 τίθεαμεν → τίθεμεν · 0213 Ἰ δὲ → Ἡ δὲ · 0213 Παῆρὸς → Πατρὸς · 0213 δονματιζόμενον → δογματιζόμενον · 0213 Ιατέρα → Πατέρα · 0213 ἀυδρῶς → ἀμυδρῶς · 0213 Γοαφῆς → Γραφῆς · 0213 ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς Ὃν πραγμάτων → ἐξ αὐτῆς τῶν πραγμάτων καὶ νοημάτων φύσεως · 0213 συσκεόώνεθα → συσκεψώμεθα · 0213 Αέγω → Λέγω · 0213 καυσις → καῦσις · 0213 βύλει → βούλει · 0213 ἠ ἐνέργεια → ἡ ἐνέργεια · 0213 Γρας ῆς → Γραφῆς · 0216 ἕτερος. ὧ Λατήα τοῦ δόγματος → ἕτερος, ὦ Λατῖνε, τοῦ δόγματος · 0216 ἀσθενής ἐστε → ἐστι · 0216 παραοειγμάτων → παραδειγμάτων · 0217 Τκῦτα → Ταῦτα · 0217 τοὐτὰ → ταὐτὰ · 0217 πρὸ τούτν → πρὸ τούτων · 0217 σύνοδ ν → σύνοδον · 0217 τὸ δὲ ἄγιος σύμβολον → τὸ δὲ ἅγιον σύμβολον · 0220 προΐντο → προΐεντο · 0220 συνεγράψαντότε → συνεγράψαντό τε · 0221 βίόλοι → βίβλοι · 0221 ιοοονοῦντες → φρονοῦντες · 0221 Γνεῦμα → Πνεῦμα · 0221 οὕτιο → οὕτω · 0221 κλέος πὸ → κλέος τὸ · 0221 λένετε → λέγετε · 0221 ἐκπορευεσίλαι → ἐκπορεύεσθαι · 0221 συγγοαφῶν → συγγραφῶν · 0221 ικπόρευσιν → ἐκπόρευσιν · 0221 Καμασκηνός → Δαμασκηνός · 0221 δίᾳ → ἰδίᾳ · 0221 τὸ κ τοῦ → τὸ ἐκ τοῦ · 0221 τὸ νεῦμα → τὸ Πνεῦμα · 0221 νοῦμεν → νοοῦμεν · 0221 Πιτρός → Πατρός · 0221 προσθρκν → προσθήκην · 0221 τὸ ἐκ τοῦ ἰατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ λἱρῶ ἐν σορευόμενον → τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευόμενον (plate leaf 108; twin Qui ex Patre Filioque procedit) · 0221 Πἱῷ → Υἱῷ.
One reading kept against the plate: 0221 δρῶντας (Calfa) where the scan's Greek column OCRs δρῶντος. The twin construes plural (Patrum vestigia sequentes … in symbolo … pronuntiare) and the whole address is to the Latins in the plural; the scan's singular is very likely its own OCR slip on a final letter. Rendered plural, logged so the choice is visible.
Negation audit (7a) — the doctrinal core
Every οὐ/οὐκ/οὐχ/μή/μηδέ/οὔτε/μηδὲ ὅλως in these four chunks was checked one by one against Calfa, the plate's Greek column and the twin before drafting, and again after. The dense sites, all carried through unaltered:
- 0212 οὐκ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ Υἱοῦ μόνον … ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ … ὅπερ οὐκ ἔστιν — the reductio; both negatives kept though the second flatly contradicts the clause it governs.
- 0212 Ἢ οὖν οὐδὲ ἐκπορευτὸν ὅλως, ἢ … ὅπερ οὐδέποτε.
- 0212 οὐχ ὅτι μὴ … ἀλλ' ὅτι μηδὲ … μηδὲ ὅλως — four negatives in one clause; see the
[lat:]above. - 0209 ἀλλ' οὐ κατὰ τὴν οὐσίαν · οὐ φύσεως διαίρεσιν … οὐδὲ τοπικὴν θέσιν … οὐδὲ χρονικῆς κινήσεως · ἄναρχος … καὶ οὐκ ἄναρχος · ἀλλ' οὐ τρεῖς ἀρχαί · ἀλλ' οὐ τρεῖς Θεοί.
- 0208 οὐκ ἀγνοῶ γε οὐδὲ τὰς αἰτίας … οὔτε μὴν εἰδὼς αὐτὰς ἀποπροσποιοῦμαι — a double negative plus a privative verb; rendered "I am not indeed ignorant … nor, knowing them, do I disown them."
- 0217 οὐδεμία σύνοδος … οὐδὲ ἓν ῥῆμα οὔτε ἀφεῖλεν οὔτε προσέθηκεν οὔτε τι … ἠλλοίωσεν — five negatives; the sentence is the argument.
- 0220 οὐκ ἠθέλησαν … προσθεῖναί τινα · οὐδόλως ἐποίησαν.
- 0221 οὔτε τὸ διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ οὔτε τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἢ μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ … δέον ἡγούμεθα · ὡς μὴ δοθείη πρόφασις · καὶ οὐχ ὡς διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ · προσέθηκαν οὐδέν · οὐ λέγεται ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ · ὅμως οὐ λέγομεν ἐν τῷ συμβόλῳ.
Pronoun-itacism audit (ἡμεῖς/ὑμεῖς). Every first/second-person plural in these chunks was checked across all three witnesses before drafting, because Calfa confuses the pair and this dialogue's whole rhetoric turns on who is being accused. All agree: 0204 κατὰ τὸν ὑμέτερον λόγον … οὐχ ἡμῖν μᾶλλον … ἀλλ' ἑαυτοῖς συνηγάγετε (twin vestram … non magis nobis, quam potius vobis ipsis); 0212 τῆς μεθ' ὑμῶν … συζητήσεως; 0217 ἡμῖν τε ἐναντιόφρονες … ὑμεῖς; 0221 καὶ ἡμῖν καὶ ὑμῖν ἔχει τὸ ἀναμφίβολον (twin et apud nos et apud vos), ἀρκέσει δὲ ὑμῖν καὶ ἡμῖν. No [lat:] candidate in this class.
Not repaired to make sense: nothing. The one place where the printed Greek does not construe on its own is 0221, Ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἀποδόσει τῆς πίστεως τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, οὐκ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευόμενον, ἰδίᾳ δὲ ἐπισημαίνεται — the first limb has no finite verb (the twin supplies exprimit). Rendered with a bracketed supplied "[it is]" rather than borrowing Allatius's verb into the English; the crux is here.
Ellipses, anchors, ratio
The Greek's own … marks (Hergenröther's elisions) are reproduced 1:1; column anchors are 1:1 with the Greek chunks ([0201][0204][0205] · [0208][0209][0212] · [0213][0216][0217][0220] · [0221]). EN:GK ratio 1.39 / 1.36 / 1.41 / 1.36 — at the dialogue anchor's 1.37×.
For the merge
- Diff the fresh-decided vocabulary above against chunks 0001–0005, especially ἀρχή/αἴτιον, προβολεύς/προβάλλεσθαι/προΐεσθαι, and the ὑπερ- coinages.
- Do not harmonize the two forms of the creed's glorification clause (anchor 0000 doubled, 0221 single) — see the
[var:]note; that divergence is Migne's. - The anchor's
[ed:]for ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ and the five in this half should end up phrased alike; they were written to the same template but not against each other.
Work-wide conventions (anchor session, 2026-07-31 — merge into the work-wide section)
- Speaker sigla as printed: ΓΡ. → GR., ΛΑΤ. → LAT.; every turn its own paragraph, however short.
- Section letter-numerals used as section marks (αʹ, βʹ …) render as arabic numerals with a period ("1.", "2."), matching the plate's own Latin column ("1. GR."). In-prose letter-numerals remain English words (Joel rule, unchanged).
- Fixed technical equivalences — never varied within this work: οὐσία = essence · φύσις = nature · ὑπόστασις = hypostasis · πρόσωπον = person · ἐκπόρευσις = procession. The dialogue's whole argument runs on these distinctions; an elegant-variation synonym is a doctrinal error here.
- Dionysian ὑπερ- compounds take "super-" (super-divine, super-existence), after the traditional English "superessential."
- Mentioned prepositions stay in Greek script: where the TEXT discusses the particles themselves (τῆς ἐξ προθέσεως… καὶ τῆς διά), keep ἐξ / διά as printed. Quoted credal CLAUSES are translated in quotation marks ("from the Son", τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ). The plate itself prints the mention-form ἐξ (leaf 84, col 172D, verified) — Calfa's ἑξ is a breathing slip, not a dropped ἐκ.
- The Trinity takes "its": ἡ Τριάς is feminine; no English exponent (Pattern 9, not a defect).
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6): result for chunk 0000 — FINDINGS (not clean)
Read against src/pg-latin/nicetas-maroneia-dialogi/0000.md (cols 0170–0175) after drafting. Sites follow. No chunk in this batch was clean; this batch is chunk 0000 only.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English, Latin/plate cited
- 0169 διομένων → δεομένων ("questions REQUIRING more exact consideration"; Lat. indigentium).
- 0169 τυνεξετάσει → συνεξετάσει (Lat. disquisitio/disputatio context).
- 0169 ἰεοπαλής → ἰσοπαλής (Lat. paris ponderis).
- 0169 ὑποκειμένην ὄλην → ὕλην (Lat. propositam materiam).
- 0172 ἐπι. δείκνυσθαι → ἐπιδείκνυσθαι; δι' ἔνδει. ξιν → ἔνδειξιν (Calfa split type).
- 0172 πεοὶ → περί · συνἡθης → συνήθης · δείκννσιν → δείκνυσιν · ἐπαγόμεναν ῇ → ἐπαγόμενα ἢ (routine OCR, bundled).
- 0172 ἀδύνατονὐδὲ → ἀδύνατον (οὐδὲ… — Calfa dropped the opening parenthesis; plate prints it (leaf 84, col 172C, verified): (οὐδὲ γὰρ ἂν συνέβαινον ἑκατέρωθεν).
- 0172 παριστῶσι. διαμάχης — stray period splitting the clause; read παριστῶσι διαμάχης καὶ διαστάσεως together (Lat. causam esse aiunt … certaminis atque discidii).
- 0173 Intrusive-Κ artifact class, recurring in this volume's Calfa file: ΠνενύΚματος → Πνεύματος · Κγμνῶσκον → γινώσκον · ἐγκαινιζόΚμενον → ἐγκαινιζόμενον.
- 0173 θωτισμός → φωτισμός (plate-verified, leaf 85: φωτισμός).
- 0173 ὡλίνω → ὠδίνω ("in travail with"; Lat. anhelo; plate-verified, leaf 85).
- 0173 άραγγας → φάραγγας (Lat. valles; plate-verified, leaf 85; Isa 40:4 allusion, see twin notes (9)–(11)).
- 0173 Speaker tag ΓΙʹ → ΓΡ. (plate-verified, leaf 85: ΓΡ.).
- 0176 ἕτεροι → ἕτερον · ὑποστάσιις → ὑποστάσεις · υμφωνεῖν → συμφωνεῖν · μικοὰν → μικράν · ἕτεραε → ἕτερα; (routine OCR).
- 0176 Calfa truncation, completed from the twin: the Greek breaks mid-word — "ὁ Πατὴρ καὶ ὁ Υἱὸς καὶ τὸ Πνεῦμα ὑπο[ΛΑΤ.]" — dropping the end of GR.'s speech. Twin (col 0175): et rursum Pater et Filius et Spiritus sunt hypostases et personae divinitatis. English completes: "…are hypostases and persons of the Godhead." Sense certain from the Latin; exact Greek wording not recoverable from our files.
Pattern 13 — [ed:], digitization lost text the plate carries
- 0173 Between the proem's end and section αʹ the plate prints a centered cross-column heading ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ. / DIALOGUS PRIMUS. (leaf 85, plate-verified by render). Calfa omits it. Restored as an inline [ed:] — NOT as a
##head, which would break Greek↔English marker parity.
Borderline Pattern-16 case — logged, NO marker (§8 Q3 calibration datum)
- 0172 / twin 0171–0174: Greek "(οὐδὲ γὰρ ἂν συνέβαινον ἑκατέρωθεν)" ("for then they would not arise on both sides") vs Allatius "(secus enim nunquam concordassent)" ("otherwise they would never have agreed") — a real sense difference, but Migne's own note (c) on the Latin column corrects Allatius: "Equidem mallem: Secus enim non ab utraque parte acciderent vel resultarent; nimirum voce συμβαίνω ut paulo ante accepta." The Latin page corrects itself in its own apparatus, so a [lat:] would report as live a divergence the plate already adjudicates. English follows the Greek; no marker. Logged because the materiality boundary ("does the plate's own apparatus settle it?") is exactly what the pilot exists to calibrate.
Plate-apparatus notes carried by the twin (not ours to mark; future fontes/scripture harvest)
The plate's notes for this span, visible in the twin and on leaf renders: (2) Laur. ἐπιεικείᾳ · (3) Laur. διαλύειν · (4) Sic Laur., Maius omittit τοῦ λόγου · (5) Apud Maium: καὶ ἀλληλότερα · (6) I Cor. II, 10 · (7) Laur: περί · (8) Cod. V: λέγε; fort. λεγεις · (9) Isa. XL, 4 · (10) Psal. LI (Vulg. L.) 10 · (11) Isa. l.c. · (b)–(e) editorial (Maius, Etherianus cross-refs). Calfa strips all note anchors from the Greek, so the English carries no [n:] markers — the identifications survive in the committed twin.
Work-wide conventions of cruces-0000.md are in force and are not restated. This file adds only what chunks 0001–0005 forced. Scan used for every plate check below: raw/scans/pg139/patrologiaecurs63migngoog_djvu.xml, leaf index = position in the file's <OBJECT> sequence; for this span leaf n carries Migne cols (2n+3)/(2n+4) (leaf 89 = 181/182 … leaf 97 = 197/198), verified against the running heads. ⚠ Formula corrected 2026-08-01 — this file originally wrote it as (2n−7)/(2n−6), which contradicts its own worked examples (2·89−7 = 171, not 181). The examples were right, the formula wrong; a blind reader caught it while using it. Arithmetic in a method note gets checked against its own examples before it is trusted.
Conventions this batch had to decide (anchor did not cover)
- ἀγένητον vs ἀγέννητον is a live distinction in this work and the Latin column cannot carry it. Migne's Greek prints both, each with the author's own parenthetical gloss on its spelling:
τὸ ἀγένητον (δι᾿ ἑνὸς ν γραφόμενον)among the essential/natural attributes (0177), andτὸ ἀγέννητον (διὰ δύο γραφόμενον ν)among the hypostatic ones (0177). Allatius renders both ingenitum. English fixes ἀγένητον = "ingenerate", ἀγέννητον = "unbegotten", and the orthographic parentheses are translated with the letter kept in Greek script ("written with a single ν" / "written with two ν") — mention-not-use, per the anchor's ἐξ/διά rule. - The προβάλλεσθαι family, fixed: προβάλλεσθαι = "put forth" · προβολεύς = "putter-forth" · προβλητικόν = "the putting-forth" · πρόβλησις = "putting-forth" · προΐεσθαι = "emit". Allatius uses spirator / spiratio / producere / emittere interchangeably; we do not import that variation.
- πρόοδος = "going-forth", never "procession". ἐκπόρευσις is reserved for "procession" by the anchor's fixed-equivalence rule, and 0180 sets πρόοδος and ἐκπόρευσις in explicit contrast (
πρόοδός τίς ἐστιν ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ … καλεῖται δὲ καὶ οὗτος ἐκπόρευσις). Latin progressio / processio keeps the same split. - ἐκπορευτόν = "proceeding" (verbal adjective, substantivized as "the proceeding"), parallel to γεννητόν "begotten" / ἀγέννητον "unbegotten".
- ἄμεσος/ἔμμεσος = "immediate"/"mediate" throughout (Latin immediata / mediata). Note that Migne's own Latin-column note (p) at col 0196 attacks this very pair — "voces mediate et immediate, prout in hac materia usurpantur, non recte explanant" — i.e. the plate's editor is unhappy with Allatius's Latin here, not with the Greek. Logged, no marker.
[lat:] markers fired — 2
- 0185 (twin col 0186) — a NEGATION the two columns do not share. Greek:
ἀλλ᾿ οὐ σύνθεσις ἐκεῖ, ἀλλ᾿ ἁπλότης ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἁπλότητα, ὅτι μέρη ταῦτα τῆς θεότητος (ἀμερὴς γὰρ ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἀμέρειαν), ἀλλ᾿ ἰδιότητες…Latin: "Verum non est compositio ibi, sed simplicitas super omnem simplicitatem, quia nec partes Divinitatis ista sunt quum ea sit super omnem indivisibilitatem indivisibilis, verum proprietates…" PLATE-VERIFIED on the Greek side (leaf 91): the scan's independent OCR readsὅτι µέρη ταῦτα τῆς θεότητος (ἀμερὴς γὰρ ὑπὲρ πᾶσαν ἀμέρειαν)— noοὐ, parenthesis present. So the Greek plate prints the sentence without the negative that its ownἀλλ᾿ ἰδιότητεςrequires; the Latin column supplies it. English follows the printed Greek ("because these are parts of the Godhead") and marks the Latin. Corroboration that the omission is the plate's and not a Calfa drop: the exactly parallel sentence at col 0188 (chunk 0003) does print the negative —ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ οὐσία ταῦτα … οὐδὲ μέρη τῆς οὐσίας· ἡ θεότης γὰρ ἀμερής— so the author's formula normally carries it. This is the dropped-negative class Pattern 7 exists to expose. - 0189/0190 (twin col 0190) — the reciprocal-ratio terms. Greek (plate-verified, leaf 93):
νῦν μὲν γινομένη τὸ ἥμισυ καὶ τὸ ὑποδιπλάσιον, νῦν δὲ τρίτον καὶ ὑποτριπλάσιον, νῦν δὲ τέταρτον καὶ ὑποτε[τρα]πλάσιον. Latin: "nunc quidem fit dimidium et duplum, nunc vero tertium et triplum, nunc quartum et quadruplum." Allatius drops the ὑπο-, which turns each pair from two names for the same ratio (half = subduple) into two opposite ratios (half and double). A reader of the Latin column takes away a different mathematical claim, so this clears Pattern 16's materiality bar. Numeral-class, so the Greek was plate-checked before the marker fired, perpg-paired-pilot.md§4.
Logged, NO marker — the plate's own apparatus or column concurrence settles it
- 0185 (twin 0184) — Migne flags the Greek himself.
τὸ Πνεῦμα ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ ἀμέσως ὡς μέση προβάλλεσθαι— feminine, agreeing with nothing. The plate (leaf 91) printsὡς μέση (15), and the numeric note reads "Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur." The page has already adjudicated it. Rendered "as being intermediate" (gender has no English exponent, Pattern 9); Allatius simply omits the phrase. - 0184 (twin 0183) — the μὲν/δέ that reverses the doctrine.
ὅτι καὶ ἀμέσως καὶ ἐμμέσως ἐκπορεύεται, τὸ μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, τὸ δὲ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ— taken positionally this gives immediately from the Father, mediately from the Son, the exact reverse of the position argued three lines earlier and again eight lines later (ἐμμέσως δηλαδὴ καὶ ἀμέσως, of Father then Son). Plate-verified, leaf 91, same order. Latin declines to map at all ("scilicet tum ex Patre, tum ex Filio") — so no material divergence and no marker. Rendered in the printed order. NB the author's μὲν/δέ pairs are demonstrably non-positional here: col 0181 (leaf 89, verified) printsὡς μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, ὡς δὲ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, τουτέστιν ἀμέσως μὲν ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ— the gloss crosses its own μέν/δέ. Recorded because it is exactly the kind of reading a later reader will suspect us of having smoothed. - 0195 (twin 0194) — "second" for "third", both columns.
καὶ πρὸς μὲν τὴν πρώτην νοεῖται … τὸ δεξιὸν ἔχουσα μέρος, πρὸς δὲ τὴν δευτέραν τὸ εὐώνυμον— the middle of three monads cannot be left of the second; the parallel sentence immediately above correctly hasπρὸς μὲν τὴν πρώτην … πρὸς δὲ τὴν τρίτην. Plate-verified, leaf 95, and Allatius prints "relate vero ad secundam" — the two columns concur. Ladder row 3 (attributable to the plate pair). Rendered literally. - 0184 (twin 0183) — Migne's Latin flagged in its own apparatus. Greek
ἀλλ᾿ ἐκεῖνό γε ἄτοπον; Latin "Attamen illud certe absurdum ostendit, quod non dicam", carrying note "Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur." The Latin, not the Greek, is what the page doubts. No marker. - 0197 note (p), col 0196 (leaf 96) — Migne's own criticism of Allatius's mediate/immediate, quoted under Conventions above. Apparatus, not ours.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English
Negations and lost parentheses (the load-bearing class — every one checked against the plate before it was restored):
- 0196 (chunk 0005), plate-verified leaf 96 — a DROPPED NEGATION in our file, not Migne's. Calfa:
οὐχ ὡς χρόνου τινὸς μεσιτεύοντος γὰρ πρῶτον μὲν γεννᾷ τὸν Υἱόν…. Plate:οὐχ ὡς χρόνου τινὸς μεσιτεύοντος (οὐ γὰρ πρῶτον μὲν γεννᾷ τὸν Υἱόν, εἶτα διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα προβάλλεται). Calfa lost(οὐas one unit — opening parenthesis plus negative, the anchor's 0172 class. Latin concurs ("neque enim Pater prius generat Filium…"). Restored. Recorded prominently: this is a case where the negation is missing from OUR file and the standing PG rule (never attribute to the plate from our files alone) was the thing that kept it from becoming a false[lat:]. - 0189/0190 (chunk 0003), plate-verified leaf 93 — Calfa
τὸ Πνεῦμαὐ γὰρ μέρη τοῦ Πατρὸς ταῦτα; plateτὸ Πνεῦμα (οὐ γὰρ μέρη τοῦ Πατρὸς ταῦτα, οὐδὲ κατὰ τομήν τινα καὶ ῥοὴν ἡ ἑκάστου γνωρίζεται πρόοδος). Same(οὐ-loss. Restored. - 0196 (chunk 0004), plate-verified leaf 94 — Calfa
ἐμμέσως δὲ ἐκ τοῦ ἡλίου τῶν ἀκτίνων γὰρ; plateἐμμέσως δὲ ἐκ τοῦ ἡλίου (διὰ τῶν ἀκτίνων γάρ). A droppedδιάinside a lost parenthesis — in this work, the work whose whole dispute is ἐξ vs διά. Restored; Latin concurs ("videlicet per radios"). - 0192/0193 (chunk 0004) — parentheses lost, no negation at risk, restored from sense + Latin:
ἡ ἐκπόρευσις (διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ γάρ);τοῦτο γὰρ καὶ οἱ Πατέρες φασί…;πρὸς ἄλληλα (ὑπὲρ σύνθεσιν γὰρ ἡ ἑνότης αὐτῶν);σύνταξις (ἦν γὰρ ἂν καὶ ἡ τῆς ὅλης Τριάδος σύνταξις σύνθεσις). Latin prints all four parentheses.
Lost speaker tags, section marks and lost text (structural):
- 0181 (chunk 0001) — a whole speech-opening lost. Calfa prints
…ἵνα γνῶ καὶ αὐτός. [0181] Πνεῦμα] ἐκπορεύεται καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, συγκέχυται…— section mark, speaker tag and the protasis opening all gone, leaving a stray]. Plate (leaf 89, verified):δʹ. ΓΡ. Εἰ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον τὸ Πνεῦμα ἐκπορεύεται καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, συγκέχυται…Restored silently per the anchor's 0176 precedent. Section number: the scan's own OCR renders the letter-numeral "5." there, but the Latin column prints 4. GR. and the printed sequence is 2 (0176) → 3 (0180) → [this] → 5 (0184,εʹpresent in Calfa), so it is δʹ = 4; the djvu "5." is OCR noise for δʹ. English prints "4. GR." - Speaker sigla mangled, all restored (each is the anchor's ΓΙʹ→ΓΡ. class): 0176
ΙΡ.→ΓΡ. · 0177ΜΑΤ.→ΛΑΤ.,ΚΓΡ.→ΓΡ.,ΠΡ.→ΓΡ. · 0181ΛΓΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0184Κσʹ. ΓΡ.→ϛʹ. ΓΡ.(intrusive-Κ class; = 6, Latin 6. GR.) · 0197ΛΔΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0200ΚΛΑΤ.→ΛΑΤ. · 0200ΓΡ.(→ΓΡ. (the(is note-anchor residue; the plate carries note (29)/(s) there). - 0176 (chunk 0001) —
ἀλλ᾿ οὐ σύνθετος… τηἐκπρευτὸν→τὸ ἐκπορευτόν;μόον→μόνον;ἀγγέννητος→ἀγέννητος (0184).
Intrusive-Κ artifact class (the anchor's ΠνενύΚματος class, still running): 0177 Κτὴν ὑπεράγαθον→τὴν · 0184 Κγεννητὸς→γεννητός · 0189 περὶ Καὐτήν→αὐτήν, τῷ λόγῳ Κδιακέκριται→διακέκριται, Κγινομένη→γινομένη, σχεΚδόν→σχεδόν, ἄγνωστόν Κτε→τε · 0193 Κφῶς→φῶς · 0200 Κφαινόμενα→ φαινόμενα.
Routine OCR, bundled (no sense at issue): 0176 Οὔτω γὰρἔδοξε, ἐοτιν, ταύτόν, Πατοὶ καὶ ἰἵῷ, υσικά, κατ᾿ οὐείαν, ἁλλά, ἑπί, ἀτδιον, ἀπερίγοαπτον, φυσικἀ, κοινῷς, Ὑπόσασιν, δηλαόή, ἀνυπἑλάκτως→ ἀνυπαλλάκτως, Υἱνῦ, ἷέννησιν, Πατοὸς, τοῦΓἰνεύαατος, Ἑνος→μόνος (Lat. solus … Unigenitus), ἔκν τινος, Υὸς, καθ᾿ δν, Υἱλν, εἰαί→εἰμί, ἐξεκάλυύε→ἐξεκάλυψε, Υλοῦ, Ινεύματος · 0184 χεννῶν, πρυνθάλλεται, Πεῦμα, ἐκπορεύόται, Ποῦ→Υἱοῦ, Γίοῦ, μόναν→μόνον, Κυρίον, λατήρ→Πατήρ, ἐχόντοιν οὐδ᾿ Ἀν ἀνομάτων→οὐδ᾿ ἐν ὀνομάτων, Κἰ γάρ→Εἰ γάρ, παναγίευ, ἐσὶ→ἐπί, Σὲ→δέ, Ἰδιότης · 0188–0192 σύνθισιν, λἱός, ἐκπορετόν→ἐκπορευτόν, παριληπτικον→περιληπτικόν, ψποστάσεων, ἰὸιότητας, προῖοῦτοα Κἐ ἐογειαν→προϊοῦσαν ἐνέργειαν, ἀλλδμως ὅλλο→ἀλλ᾿ ὅμως ἄλλο, ἀριθμοῖς, τρίο ναὶ ὑποτοιπλάσιον→τρίτον καὶ ὑποτριπλάσιον, τετράγωνες, ποντάγωνος, φεινομένη, ἄπλουστάηη, ὑποσπτάσεων, ἐνυΤαρχούσης, συνθςτοις, τὸ!] εῦμα→τὸ Πνεῦμα · 0193–0196 ἐκπρρελόμενον, Πεὖμα, Ιρῶτον, ῦτο γάρ→τοῦτο γάρ, Ιἱός, Θ γάρ→Ἢ γάρ, ἐκτοῦ ΥΙοῦ, ακρων, τριων, νεύματος→Πνεύματος, κ τοῦ ΙΙατρὸς→ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός · 0197–0200 ἡ οὲ→ἡ δέ, ατελής, ἐκπύρευσις/ἐκπίρευσιν, τοῦΠατρός, διαροράν, παρεμφαίνουσ, Ὁμὲν, Ιατρός/Γατρός, Οίοῦ, χωοίζονται, ἐκ τοῶ Πασοός, Ὥοπερ, ἕκαστυν, Υἱλς, δτι, συνορῷ, Ἱσως, Πνεῦρα το ἅγιον, εἴῷ, λἱοῦ, υἱωνὸςὲ→υἱωνὸς δέ, φθέγγεσθνι, ἐκατερα, ἐν τῷ αὐτῳ, αὐτων, ποὸς.
One correction taken on plate authority against Calfa: 0196 (chunk 0004) Calfa Τῆς γὰρ μονᾶς ὁποτερασοῦν οὔσης τελείας; plate (leaf 96, verified) Τῆς γὰρ μιᾶς ὁποτερασοῦν οὔσης τελείας, Latin "Si enim una…". Rendered "the one of them, whichever it be". Left unmarked because the plate settles it; worth noting only because μονάς is a live technical term four lines earlier and a reader might expect it here.
Pattern 7 non-word type carried into the English
- 0181 — προεκτικόν.
τὸ γεννητικὸν καὶ προβλητικὸν ἤτοι προεκτικόν, εἰ οὕτω χρὴ λέγειν. Not an attested Greek word (προετικός, from προΐημι, is what the sense and the Latin sive emissio want). Both OCRs of the plate — Calfa and the scan's own (leaf 89) — readπροεκτικόν, and the author's ownεἰ οὕτω χρὴ λέγειν("if one must so speak") shows he knows he is coining. Carried in italics untranslated per Pattern 7's non-word rule rather than silently read as προετικόν. Conjecture recorded here.
Scripture quoted in these chunks — divergences from the received text: NONE
Two only, both verbatim against the received Greek text, both matching the Latin column:
- 0184 John 10:30 —
Ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν(Calfaλατήρ, OCR; plate leaf 91 clean). Lat. Ego et Pater unum sumus. - 0193 John 14:11 —
Ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ Πατρὶ καὶ ὁ Πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί. Lat. Ego in Patre et Pater in me. There is one non-scriptural named authority: 0196,κατὰ τὸν σοφὸν Διονύσιον(ps.-Dionysius, De div. nom.), where the plate carries variant note (24) "Cod. ἀδύνατον" against ourἀδύναμον— apparatus, not a divergence. The florilegium of patristic testimonies is later in the work; the first five chunks reach it only through this one Dionysian tag.
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6) — per-chunk result
Every chunk got the deliberate post-draft pass against its twin. Outcome:
- 0001 — findings (twin cols 0178–0182): the lost section-4 opening (restored from the plate + twin); the
ἐκπορευτόν-list where Allatius collapses ἀγένητον/ἀγέννητον to a single ingenitum; twin's own OCR lacunae at cols 0179 (Filii generationem, qua neque genitus— words dropped) and (ritus sanctus est procedens— head of solus enim Spiritus dropped), which are defects in the VERIFIER and are not divergences. - 0002 — findings:
[lat:]#1 (the 0185 negation) + three no-marker adjudications (μέση, the μὲν/δέ reversal, the quod non dicam note). Also theἸμεῖς→ἡμεῖς restoration at 0184, settled by the twin's first-person dicimus (itacism class; no marker fired, so no plate check was required, and none was taken). - 0003 — findings:
[lat:]#2 (the ὑπο- ratios); the lost(οὐ γὰρ μέρηparenthesis; the corroborating negated parallel at col 0188 that made the 0185 finding attributable. Alsoκαθά φατε καὶ ὑμεῖς(0188) — the other pronoun-itacism class — confirmed by the twin's secundum quod et vos dicitis; no marker, no plate check needed. - 0004 — findings: the plate-verified
(διὰ τῶν ἀκτίνων γάρ)restoration; theπρὸς δὲ τὴν δευτέρανconcurrence;μονᾶς→μιᾶς. The twin for cols 0195–0196 is line-interleaved by the column crop (the run beginning "neque enim simplicibus simplicitas essentia … qui vero circa essentiam sunt, licet unius … reddunt" is not continuous prose) and was treated as unusable for that stretch rather than read as divergence — flagging this for pilot §8 Q1: the twin's sanity gate is word-count-based and would not catch an interleave. - 0005 — findings: the plate-verified
(οὐ γὰρrestoration at col 0196. Otherwise the columns run together closely.
No chunk in this batch came back clean. Reporting that plainly, since the pilot asks for it: 0/5 clean, and in four of the five the finding was a defect in our file rather than a divergence between Migne's columns — which is the result the standing PG attribution rule predicts and the reason the twin plus the plate were both needed.
Plate apparatus visible in the twin for this span (not ours to mark)
Numeric notes (Greek column): (15) Ita scriptum. Quod tamen mendum exhibere videtur. [on μέση, 0184] · (16) Cod. Vat. f. 5,6, mendose, ὑπόθεσις · (18) Cod. Vat. Ἐκπορεύεται · (19) marginal, Gk: Ἐνταῦθα εἰσαγωγὴ ἑτέρου ἀτόπου ὅτι διπλῆ ἔσται ἡ τοῦ Πνεύματος ἐκπόρευσις… · (21) Frequen[ter]… · (23) marginal, Gk: Ἕτερον ἄτοπον ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευομένου τοῦ Πνεύματος, ἢ ἀτελὴς ἡ ἐκπόρευσις ἑκατέρα ἢ περιττὴ ἡ ἑτέρα · (24) Cod. ἀδύνατον · (26) Vat. εἰ · (28) Vat. τελείων · (29) marginal, Gk: Ἕτερον ἄτοπον, ὅτι εἰ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα υἱὸς ἔσται τοῦ Υἱοῦ. Letter notes (Latin column): (f) Elias of Crete on Greg. Naz. or. 11 + Arist. Metaph. IV · (k) S. Maximus, Opusc. theol. et polem. II p. 155 ed. Combefis; ps.-Justin Expos. rectae fidei n. 3 · (m)/(4) on προβάλλεσθαι being middle, not passive · (n)/(o) the two marginal aliud absurdum notes, (o) adding the cross-reference to Photius, De Spiritus sancti mystagogia c. 7 and Nicholas of Methone c. 11 for the Greek's fourth argument · (p) Haec sane non satis accurate dicta sunt + the attack on mediate / immediate · (q), (r) (imitatur Gregorii Nazianzeni responsum or. 27) · (s) Quintum argumentum. Calfa strips all note anchors from the Greek, so the English carries no [n:] markers; the identifications survive in the committed twin and are listed here for the eventual fontes/scripture harvest.
Second half of the work (chunks 0006–0009 of 10). Chunks 0001–0005 were held by a peer agent who could not see this file; the merge is a required later step, not done here. Conventions below are the anchor's (cruces-0000.md) unless flagged as decided fresh.
Method note — what "plate-verified" means in this batch
The Latin twin was cropped from raw/scans/pg139/patrologiaecurs63migngoog_djvu.xml by x-range split. The same leaves carry Migne's GREEK column in that XML, and its OCR is independent of Calfa's. Every reading marked plate-verified below was checked against the Greek column of the named leaf (leaves 98–108 = cols 0201–0221), so the evidence is a second witness to the plate, not a second reading of our own file. Where the scan OCR is itself illegible at the point at issue, that is said.
Conventions carried from the anchor (unchanged)
Speaker sigla ΓΡ./ΛΑΤ. → GR./LAT., one paragraph per turn · section letter-numerals as arabic + period · οὐσία = essence, φύσις = nature, ὑπόστασις = hypostasis, πρόσωπον = person, ἐκπόρευσις = procession · ὑπερ- compounds take "super-" · mentioned particles stay in Greek script, quoted credal clauses translated in " ".
Conventions decided fresh (flag for the merge)
These terms first fall due in this half of the work; the peer's half may have settled some of them differently.
- ἀρχή = "principle" throughout, including where English would prefer "beginning" or "origin" — the whole of §§2–4 turns on ἀρχή/ἄναρχος/ὑπεράρχιος being one word. Consequently ἄναρχος = "without principle" (Lat. principii expers) and ὑπεράρχιος = "super-principial".
- αἴτιον = "cause" (never "principle"), kept distinct from ἀρχή because 0213 sets them side by side: καὶ ἀρχὴ καὶ ἀρχή, καὶ οὐ δύο ἀρχαί, οὐδὲ δύο τὰ αἴτια.
- προβολεύς = "producer" · προβάλλεσθαι = "to produce" · προΐεσθαι = "to send forth" — three distinct words for the Latin's single producere; kept apart because 0201 contrasts οὐδὲν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα προΐεται with τὸ ἑτέρας ὑποστάσεως προετικόν.
- ὕφεσις = "diminution" (Lat. minoratio).
- γεννητόν = "that which is begotten" · ἐκπορευτόν = "that which proceeds", and ἐκπορευτόν predicatively = "capable of proceeding" (0212: οὐδὲ ἐκπορευτὸν ὅλως).
- ὑπερ- compounds coined in this half: ὑπεράριθμος = "super-numerical", ὑπερφυής = "super-natural" (hyphenated, to keep it visibly a compound and not the ordinary English word), ὑπερταγής = "super-ordered".
- πατριά = "fatherhood" at 0209, on the authority of Migne's own note (y) on that column: Πατριὰ hic non est genus, gens, origo, sed paternitas, ut Ephes. III, 15, ad quem textum alluditur. The plate settles it; no conjecture of ours.
- ὁμοούσιον carried untranslated in italics as homoousion at 0217 — the word is the subject of the sentence as a word ("which is one single word of the creed"), so an English equivalent would dissolve the argument. Mention-vs-use rule, extended from particles to this one term.
- γηγενάρχης = "head of the earth-born" · ἀγγελάρχης = "chief of the angels" (Lat. terrigenarum generis princeps, angelorum princeps).
- παρόμοιον rendered "nearly-like" at 0205 — the semi-Arian term in a list of words the heretics use; "similar" (Lat. simile) would lose that it is a technical slogan.
Latin-twin pass (pilot §6) — result by chunk
Performed after drafting, against src/pg-latin/nicetas-maroneia-dialogi/000[6-9].md.
- 0006 — findings (one [var:], one numeral candidate logged unfired, OCR class).
- 0007 — findings (one [lat:] fired; one polarity repair on our side).
- 0008 — findings (three lost headings, one lost editorial bridge, OCR class).
- 0009 — CLEAN on the divergence test. Every fact, name, negation and clause in col. 0221 is asserted alike by both columns; the only Latin departures are Allatius's routine looseness (et confitemur added to the closing sentence, which the Greek does not print) and readings Migne's own notes (78)–(79) already record. No
[lat:], no crux beyond the OCR list below.
No chunk in this batch was clean of Calfa OCR damage. The twin pass found no "Greek made no sense and the Latin explains why" case that the plate's own Greek column did not settle more directly.
Pattern 16 — [lat: …] fired: ONE
- 0212 / twin col. 0211. Greek: Οὗτος ὁ λόγος δείκνυσιν οὐχ ὅτι μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ, ἀλλ' ὅτι μηδὲ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορεύεται, μηδὲ ὅλως ἐκπορευτόν ἐστι. Allatius: Hec ratiocinatio ostendit, non quod procedit ex Filio, sed quod neque ex Patre procedit, neque omnino procedens est. The Latin has no equivalent of the Greek's μή. Plate-verified: leaf 103, Greek column, reads δείκνυσιν οὐχ ὅτι μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ — the negative is on the plate, not a Calfa intrusion. The divergence is material and doctrinal: on the Greek the Latin speaker concedes that the Greek's reductio disproves the denial of procession from the Son as much as the assertion of it (μηδέ then escalates: "nor from the Father either"); on Allatius he concedes only that it fails to prove procession from the Son. English follows the Greek; marker fired. Migne prints no note adjudicating this column, so the plate's own apparatus does not settle it (contrast the anchor's concordassent case).
Pattern 16 — candidates LOGGED, marker NOT fired
- 0205 / twin col. 0206 — section numeral εʹ vs Latin "6." Greek plate-verified as εʹ (leaf 100, Greek column: ε'. Ἡ τοίνυν τάξις), and Calfa agrees. The Latin column's numeral OCRs as "6." at 85% confidence in a typeface where 5 and 6 are confusable, on a rough crop. Per the standing rule that numerals need the Greek plate-verified before a marker fires, the Greek side is clean — but the Latin side here is the unverified one, and firing on it would manufacture a divergence out of crop noise. The Latin column also drops the δʹ mark entirely two sections earlier, which is enough to explain a one-off numbering slip. Logged; no marker; a leaf render would settle it in a minute if anyone wants it.
- 0216 / twin col. 0215 — Ἐπίσχες vs Retinuisti. Greek imperative "Hold back, O Greek" (plate leaf 105: Ἐπίσχε, imperative); Allatius gives the aorist indicative, "You have held back, O Greek." A real construal difference, but it is Allatius reading an ambiguous form one letter differently, which is the far end of his ordinary freedom rather than a different fact about the transmission. Logged; no marker. This is a materiality-boundary datum for pilot §8 Q3: mood/person shifts on an ambiguous form are being treated as looseness, not divergence.
- 0221 / twin col. 0222 — the closing sentence. Migne's note (79) records that Allatius's own version read quod satis utrisque, nobis et vobis, amorem conciliabit against the printed Satis … consensio in unum … erit. The plate has already adjudicated its own Latin, per the anchor's rule; logged, no marker. The printed Latin agrees with the Greek.
Pattern 14 — [var: …] fired: TWO (the divergence list)
Both are quotations Migne prints in a form the received text does not carry. These are the most valuable findings in the batch, and the search for them was word-by-word against the plate, not against memory.
- 0204, John 14:28. Migne's Greek prints Ὁ Πατήρ ΜΟΥ μείζων μου ἐστίν — with the possessive on Father as well as on the comparative. Plate-verified: leaf 98, Greek column, Ὁ Πατήρ μου μείζων μου ἐστίν (33), note (33) = Joan. xiv, 28. The received NT text is ὁ πατὴρ μείζων μού ἐστιν, with one μου only. Allatius's column carries the doubled possessive too (Pater meus major me est), so both columns concur against the received text — ladder row 3, the two-witness case. Rendered as Migne prints it ("My Father is greater than I");
[var: Gk. …]. - 0221, the creed. Migne prints the clause the Greek speaker urges on the Latins as τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συνδοξαζόμενον — one verb. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan text has two, συμπροσκυνούμενον καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον. Plate-verified: leaf 108, Greek column, τὸ σὺν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συνδοξαζόμενον εἴπατε; the Latin column likewise gives only qui cum Patre et Filio simul glorificatur. Both columns concur; rendered as printed;
[var: …]. Worth noting for whoever merges: the anchor's chunk 0000 uses the full doubled formula in the proem (συμπροσκυνούμενον … καὶ συνδοξαζόμενον), so this is a divergence inside the work, not a house style — do not harmonize the two at merge time.
Pattern 13 — [ed: …], text the DIGITIZATION lost that the plate carries
This work is Hergenröther's set of fragments of dialogues II–VI, and its structural furniture is exactly what Calfa strips. Five centered division headings and two editorial bridges are gone from our Greek. All are restored as [ed: …], never as ## heads (marker parity with the Greek chunk), following the anchor's ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ precedent.
- 0201 (leaf 98) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΣ / DIALOGUS SECUNDUS, plus the section mark αʹ that follows it and governs ΛΑΤ. Ἐπηγγείλω. The heading is set as two centered lines spanning the gutter, which is why the crop split it (ΛΟΓΟΣ + DIALOGUS on the Greek side, ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΣ (30) + SECUNDUS on the Latin). The αʹ is restored silently as "1." — routine, plate-verified, and the Latin column prints "1." too.
- 0204 (leaf 99) — editorial bridge before Τὸ μεῖζον ἄρα: our Greek runs the two speeches together across the column anchor. The Latin twin at col. 0203 carries it (Sequitur prolixa de hoc argumento tractatio … deinde in Vatic., cod. 1115 f. 11 b. med. Latinus).
[ed:]describes the loss; nothing of the Latin's wording is imported into the running text. - 0205 (leaf 100) — the clause καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ πρότερον… is truncated by Calfa to καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ α, which then fuses with the initial Ἵν- of the next sentence: Calfa reads καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ α δὲ ὁ λόγος ἐξεταστικώτερος γένηται, a non-sentence. Plate: καὶ τὸ πρῶτον καὶ τὸ πρότερον… [ed. bridge] …Ἵνα δὲ ὁ λόγος ἐξεταστικώτερος γένηται. πρότερον restored silently; the bridge marked
[ed:]. - 0212 (leaves 102–103) — the closing speech of the Latin, ΛΑΤ. Ἔστω καὶ ταῦτα, καθά σοι δοκεῖ· ἐχέτω πέρας ὡδὶ ἡ παροῦσα διάλεξις, is dropped whole by Calfa, and with it ΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΡΙΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS TERTIUS. The speech is plate-verified in the Greek column (leaf 102) and corroborated by the twin (LAT. Sint et hec, ut tibi videtur, et habeat hic disputatio finem presens), so it is rendered in the running text — ladder row 1, as the anchor did at 0176 — and an
[ed:]says plainly that our source drops it, so no reader meets a restored speech unmarked. - 0213 (leaf 103) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS QUARTUS.
- 0216 (leaf 105) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΕΜΠΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS QUINTUS.
- 0217 (leaf 105) — ΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΚΤΟΣ / DIALOGUS SEXTUS.
- 0217 (leaf 106) — editorial bridge between the Greek's two consecutive speeches (Deinde Latinus multa profert pro sua sententia … Postea Graecus ita prosequitur). Marked because without it the page shows GR. answering GR., which reads as our bug.
Fragment boundaries as found: dialogue II opens at col. 0201/0202 and the work runs to a stop at col. 0221 in mid-argument, where PG 139 turns to the next author (Joannes of Citrus). Ellipses (…) inside the Greek are Hergenröther's own and are reproduced as printed; no gap anywhere was bridged with invented connective prose.
Ladder row 1 — Calfa OCR damage, corrected silently in the English
Itemized inline these would drown the text (register rule). Grouped by column. Unless marked otherwise, the correction is confirmed by the plate's Greek column on the leaf named in the section head above.
Polarity- and sense-bearing (these are the ones that mattered):
- 0209 περίγραπτος → ἀπερίγραπτος. Calfa prints οὐδὲ τοπικὴν θέσιν — περίγραπτος γὰρ ἡ Τριὰς καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντα τόπον, i.e. "circumscribed, for the Trinity is circumscribed and above every place" — the exact opposite of the argument, and self-contradicting within its own parenthesis. Calfa has swallowed the opening (ἀ. Plate (leaf 102): (ἀπερίγραπτος ἡ Τριὰς καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντα τόπον); twin: incircumscripta est enim Trinitas et super omnem locum. Two independent witnesses; corrected. This is the single most dangerous defect in the batch — it is invisible once translated, it makes a grammatical English sentence, and it inverts a doctrinal predicate.
- 0201 οὐκ ἀλίνα δείέομεν → οὐκ ὀλίγα δείξομεν, "we shall show not a few." The scan's Greek OCR drops the οὐκ (reads ὀλίγα), so on the plate side alone the sense would be "a few"; Calfa and the twin (eaque non pauca) both carry the negation, and it is the negation that makes the sentence a threat rather than a concession. Kept. Recorded here because it is a case where the plate OCR is the witness that dropped a negative.
- 0201 ὄφεσις → ὕφεσις ("diminution"). Both OCRs read ὄφεσις, which is not a Greek word; the twin gives minoratio, and the same word recurs correctly as ἡ ὕφεσις four columns later (0205, both witnesses). Corrected as a non-word, not as a reading we prefer.
- 0209 τοῖς τρισίν → ταῖς τρισίν (plate); no English exponent, recorded only so the merge is not surprised.
- 0209 διαφορά → διαφοράς (plate; twin secundum differentias).
- 0220 Calfa's column-break hole: it prints πολλαὶ ἀμφιβολίαι μετὰ [0220] συμβόλου λέξις ἐστί, having lost the run that bridges leaves 106→107. Plate: … μετὰ ταῦτα περὶ τοῦ ὁμοουσίου γεγόνασιν, ὅπερ μία συμβόλου λέξις ἐστί; twin: multa postmodum de homousio quae una tantummodo symboli dictio est, dubia essent exorta. Restored silently from the plate (not from the twin); the whole clause about the homoousion — the analogy on which the speaker's entire argument against additions rests — was absent from our Greek.
- 0221 Calfa prints εἰς τὸ μέδιαιρέσεως αἴτιον, fusing across a lost run. Plate (leaves 107–108): εἰς τὸ μέσον κοινόν, καὶ σχίσματος τοσούτου καὶ διαιρέσεως αἴτιον; twin: neque scandalum commune in medium introducere, quod tanti schismatis et divisionis causa sit. Restored from the plate.
Speaker sigla mangled by Calfa (all restored, all plate-verified): 0201 ΠΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0201 ΑΑΤ. → ΛΑΤ.; 0201 ΤΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0204 ΛΛΤ. → ΛΑΤ.; 0213 λΑΤ → ΛΑΤ.; 0216 ΕΡ. → ΓΡ.; 0216 ΛΑΤ.θ → ΛΑΤ.; 0212 ΑΑΤ. → ΛΑΤ. 0213: Calfa drops the ΓΡ. tag entirely before Πάραγε δή μοι καὶ ταῦτα, silently handing the Greek's speech to the Latin; the plate (leaf 104) and the twin (GR. Profer jam mihi) both carry it. Restored.
Section marks: 0205 νʹ → γʹ ("3.") — plate leaf 99 reads γ'., twin reads 3.; Calfa's ν is an OCR of γ, and left standing it would have printed "50." in the English. 0201 αʹ restored (lost with the heading, above).
The intrusive-Κ class (already named in the anchor's cruces for chunk 0000, and still running at this end of the volume): 0209 Κθεοί → θεοί · 0209 Κγὰρ → γάρ · 0213 Κἵκα → ἵνα · 0213 Κἐμφαῖνον → ἐμφαῖνον · 0217 Κῥνωθεν → ἄνωθεν · 0217 Κἐτράνωσεν → ἐτράνωσεν · 0220 Κσυμβόλῳ → συμβόλῳ.
Dropped opening parenthesis class (same defect as the anchor's 0172 ἀδύνατονὐδὲ): 0209 ἁπασῶνπὲρ φύσιν → ἁπασῶν (ὑπὲρ φύσιν · 0209 ἁπασῶνκὲρ τάξιν → ἁπασῶν (ὑπὲρ τάξιν · 0209 διαίρεσιν παρεισάγουσαα γὰρ ἡ φύσις → διαίρεσιν παρεισάγουσα (μία γὰρ ἡ φύσις · 0209 θέσινπερίγραπτος → θέσιν (ἀπερίγραπτος (see above) · 0209 τὸ ἅμαν οἷς γὰρ → τὸ ἅμα (ἐν οἷς γὰρ.
Routine letter-level damage, bundled (correction ← Calfa): 0201 ἀναλαβόντες kept (Calfa's reading; the scan's Greek OCR gives only λαβόντες, but the twin's disputationem resumentes wants the ἀνα-) · 0201 ἑτοπα → ἄτοπα · 0201 ἐκτοῦ → ἐκ τοῦ · 0201 ατρὸς → Πατρὸς · 0201 ἐχόντοιν kept (genitive dual, both witnesses — not an error) · 0201 Πατοὸς → Πατρὸς · 0204 θΗατήρ → Ὁ Πατήρ · 0204 εἴῃνε → εἴληχε · 0204 φατὲ/φατέ as printed · 0205 ὁ ὸς → ὁ Υἱὸς · 0205 Ἀ δὲ Πατὴρ → ὁ δὲ Πατὴρ · 0205 Ιει → ἕξει · 0205 Μακεἐόνιος → Μακεδόνιος · 0205 ποοὸν → ποσόν · 0208 ποότερον → πρότερον · 0208 λέ, εται → λέγεται · 0208 τὰ κῶ γράμματα → τὰ κδʹ γράμματα (twenty-four; plate κδ', twin Viginti quatuor — a letter-numeral, verified on both sides before rendering) · 0209 Δδάμ → Ἀδάμ · 0209 Ἀιχαὴλ → Μιχαὴλ · 0209 ἀν οὐρανοῖς → ἐν οὐρανοῖς · 0209 θεαρχκῆς → θεαρχικῆς · 0209 όῦτως → οὕτως · 0209 Τίοῦ → Υἱοῦ · 0212 τίθεαμεν → τίθεμεν · 0213 Ἰ δὲ → Ἡ δὲ · 0213 Παῆρὸς → Πατρὸς · 0213 δονματιζόμενον → δογματιζόμενον · 0213 Ιατέρα → Πατέρα · 0213 ἀυδρῶς → ἀμυδρῶς · 0213 Γοαφῆς → Γραφῆς · 0213 ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς Ὃν πραγμάτων → ἐξ αὐτῆς τῶν πραγμάτων καὶ νοημάτων φύσεως · 0213 συσκεόώνεθα → συσκεψώμεθα · 0213 Αέγω → Λέγω · 0213 καυσις → καῦσις · 0213 βύλει → βούλει · 0213 ἠ ἐνέργεια → ἡ ἐνέργεια · 0213 Γρας ῆς → Γραφῆς · 0216 ἕτερος. ὧ Λατήα τοῦ δόγματος → ἕτερος, ὦ Λατῖνε, τοῦ δόγματος · 0216 ἀσθενής ἐστε → ἐστι · 0216 παραοειγμάτων → παραδειγμάτων · 0217 Τκῦτα → Ταῦτα · 0217 τοὐτὰ → ταὐτὰ · 0217 πρὸ τούτν → πρὸ τούτων · 0217 σύνοδ ν → σύνοδον · 0217 τὸ δὲ ἄγιος σύμβολον → τὸ δὲ ἅγιον σύμβολον · 0220 προΐντο → προΐεντο · 0220 συνεγράψαντότε → συνεγράψαντό τε · 0221 βίόλοι → βίβλοι · 0221 ιοοονοῦντες → φρονοῦντες · 0221 Γνεῦμα → Πνεῦμα · 0221 οὕτιο → οὕτω · 0221 κλέος πὸ → κλέος τὸ · 0221 λένετε → λέγετε · 0221 ἐκπορευεσίλαι → ἐκπορεύεσθαι · 0221 συγγοαφῶν → συγγραφῶν · 0221 ικπόρευσιν → ἐκπόρευσιν · 0221 Καμασκηνός → Δαμασκηνός · 0221 δίᾳ → ἰδίᾳ · 0221 τὸ κ τοῦ → τὸ ἐκ τοῦ · 0221 τὸ νεῦμα → τὸ Πνεῦμα · 0221 νοῦμεν → νοοῦμεν · 0221 Πιτρός → Πατρός · 0221 προσθρκν → προσθήκην · 0221 τὸ ἐκ τοῦ ἰατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ λἱρῶ ἐν σορευόμενον → τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευόμενον (plate leaf 108; twin Qui ex Patre Filioque procedit) · 0221 Πἱῷ → Υἱῷ.
One reading kept against the plate: 0221 δρῶντας (Calfa) where the scan's Greek column OCRs δρῶντος. The twin construes plural (Patrum vestigia sequentes … in symbolo … pronuntiare) and the whole address is to the Latins in the plural; the scan's singular is very likely its own OCR slip on a final letter. Rendered plural, logged so the choice is visible.
Negation audit (7a) — the doctrinal core
Every οὐ/οὐκ/οὐχ/μή/μηδέ/οὔτε/μηδὲ ὅλως in these four chunks was checked one by one against Calfa, the plate's Greek column and the twin before drafting, and again after. The dense sites, all carried through unaltered:
- 0212 οὐκ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ Υἱοῦ μόνον … ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ … ὅπερ οὐκ ἔστιν — the reductio; both negatives kept though the second flatly contradicts the clause it governs.
- 0212 Ἢ οὖν οὐδὲ ἐκπορευτὸν ὅλως, ἢ … ὅπερ οὐδέποτε.
- 0212 οὐχ ὅτι μὴ … ἀλλ' ὅτι μηδὲ … μηδὲ ὅλως — four negatives in one clause; see the
[lat:]above. - 0209 ἀλλ' οὐ κατὰ τὴν οὐσίαν · οὐ φύσεως διαίρεσιν … οὐδὲ τοπικὴν θέσιν … οὐδὲ χρονικῆς κινήσεως · ἄναρχος … καὶ οὐκ ἄναρχος · ἀλλ' οὐ τρεῖς ἀρχαί · ἀλλ' οὐ τρεῖς Θεοί.
- 0208 οὐκ ἀγνοῶ γε οὐδὲ τὰς αἰτίας … οὔτε μὴν εἰδὼς αὐτὰς ἀποπροσποιοῦμαι — a double negative plus a privative verb; rendered "I am not indeed ignorant … nor, knowing them, do I disown them."
- 0217 οὐδεμία σύνοδος … οὐδὲ ἓν ῥῆμα οὔτε ἀφεῖλεν οὔτε προσέθηκεν οὔτε τι … ἠλλοίωσεν — five negatives; the sentence is the argument.
- 0220 οὐκ ἠθέλησαν … προσθεῖναί τινα · οὐδόλως ἐποίησαν.
- 0221 οὔτε τὸ διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ οὔτε τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἢ μὴ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ … δέον ἡγούμεθα · ὡς μὴ δοθείη πρόφασις · καὶ οὐχ ὡς διὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ · προσέθηκαν οὐδέν · οὐ λέγεται ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ · ὅμως οὐ λέγομεν ἐν τῷ συμβόλῳ.
Pronoun-itacism audit (ἡμεῖς/ὑμεῖς). Every first/second-person plural in these chunks was checked across all three witnesses before drafting, because Calfa confuses the pair and this dialogue's whole rhetoric turns on who is being accused. All agree: 0204 κατὰ τὸν ὑμέτερον λόγον … οὐχ ἡμῖν μᾶλλον … ἀλλ' ἑαυτοῖς συνηγάγετε (twin vestram … non magis nobis, quam potius vobis ipsis); 0212 τῆς μεθ' ὑμῶν … συζητήσεως; 0217 ἡμῖν τε ἐναντιόφρονες … ὑμεῖς; 0221 καὶ ἡμῖν καὶ ὑμῖν ἔχει τὸ ἀναμφίβολον (twin et apud nos et apud vos), ἀρκέσει δὲ ὑμῖν καὶ ἡμῖν. No [lat:] candidate in this class.
Not repaired to make sense: nothing. The one place where the printed Greek does not construe on its own is 0221, Ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἀποδόσει τῆς πίστεως τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός, οὐκ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἐκπορευόμενον, ἰδίᾳ δὲ ἐπισημαίνεται — the first limb has no finite verb (the twin supplies exprimit). Rendered with a bracketed supplied "[it is]" rather than borrowing Allatius's verb into the English; the crux is here.
Ellipses, anchors, ratio
The Greek's own … marks (Hergenröther's elisions) are reproduced 1:1; column anchors are 1:1 with the Greek chunks ([0201][0204][0205] · [0208][0209][0212] · [0213][0216][0217][0220] · [0221]). EN:GK ratio 1.39 / 1.36 / 1.41 / 1.36 — at the dialogue anchor's 1.37×.
For the merge
- Diff the fresh-decided vocabulary above against chunks 0001–0005, especially ἀρχή/αἴτιον, προβολεύς/προβάλλεσθαι/προΐεσθαι, and the ὑπερ- coinages.
- Do not harmonize the two forms of the creed's glorification clause (anchor 0000 doubled, 0221 single) — see the
[var:]note; that divergence is Migne's. - The anchor's
[ed:]for ΛΟΓΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ and the five in this half should end up phrased alike; they were written to the same template but not against each other.