MIGNE.APP

Cruces

De modo orandi

Hugh of Saint Victor — read the work →

These are the edition's working notes, published as they were written. They record, work by work, where Migne's plate is defective or the reading uncertain: the printed form, what the English does with it, and why. They are not a groomed apparatus. Where a note argues with itself, withdraws an earlier decision, or leaves a question open, that is the record of how the reading was actually reached, and it is left standing — a conjecture that is visible can be checked, and one that has been tidied away cannot.

The English never silently repairs the page. A construable but wrong reading is rendered literally and the conjecture is recorded here, never applied to the text. How the English is produced and checked →

Garbled or irregular printed readings in Migne's plate, rendered per the intended reading (house convention) and logged here, plus one standing terminology decision.

Standing terminology decision (applies to all chunks)

The treatise is built on a borrowed rhetorical vocabulary, and its whole argument turns on the terms staying distinct from one another:

"Postulation" rather than "petition" for postulatio is deliberate: Hugh uses petitio alongside it in the same definitions, so collapsing the two would erase the distinction his three-fold scheme rests on. Cheap to reverse if a human prefers "request."

Chunk 0000

Chunk 0001

Chunk 0002

No garbled readings found in this chunk.

Chunk 0003

Chunk 0004

Citation notes — passed through verbatim

[n: …] contents are reproduced unchanged per the marker rule. All numerals in this work check out against the Vulgate psalter (Psal. CXLIII, V, L, II, LXXVII, XVII, VIII, XLVI, XXX, XII, VI, LI, XCIII, XXV, I, CVIII, III) and against John 11 and John 2. The two [n: (Ibid.)] / [n: (ibid.)] chains resolve to (Joan. II) at 0981C and to (Psal. III) at 0988A respectively.

<!-- corpus-polarity-sweep 2026-07-28 --> ## Corpus polarity sweep — 2026-07-28

Blind Opus read of the Latin/English pair for sense-reversing defects (one word or one letter asserting the opposite of what the context requires). 1 site(s). Migne's defects are recorded here and rendered literally in the English; our own errors were fixed in place. Full context: data/sweeps/corpus-polarity/REPORT.md.

0980B — sense-reversing-letter (migne, low confidence)

Printed: Hoc genus orandi in forma est, et quam prae caeteris omnibus unicum, tam est apud Deum prae caeteris omnibus pretiosum.

Conjecture: Read informe est ("is formless") for the plate's word-divided in forma est; the privative in- has been split off and the claim inverted from "has no form" to "has form."

Pure prayer is defined immediately before as the prayer that loses its own content: "prae amoris ejus magnitudine etiam petitionis suae obliviscatur ... ejus etiam, pro quo venit, curam libenter postponat" — it forgets even its own petition and sets aside the very business it came for. A few lines later the same chapter makes the outward formlessness explicit and grades it as the mark of the highest devotion: "quod per sola nomina fit, quo magis est foris significatione imperfectum, tanto magis intus est abundantia dilectionis plenum ... quanto major et ferventior intus est, tanto minus foris per vocem explicari potest", and "Illud igitur, quod solis nominibus fit, ad puram orationem pertinere videtur." Pure prayer is precisely the species with the least outward form, so "in forma est" asserts the opposite of what its own neighbours require. The English "in a form of its own" is a silent repair that smooths the defective plate rather than translating it.